C.F.R. » Title 49 » PART 1—ORGANIZATION AND DELEGATION OF POWERS AND DUTIES › Subpart B—Office of the Secretary

49 C.F.R. § 1.44

Office of Intelligence, Security and Emergency Response

Read at: eCFRecfr.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov CasesGoogle Scholar

The Director of the Office of Intelligence, Security and Emergency Response is responsible for the development, coordination, and execution of plans and procedures for the Department to balance transportation security requirements with the safety, mobility and economic needs of the Nation through effective intelligence, security, preparedness and emergency response programs. The Director is the Department's principal Emergency Coordinator for the implementation of these programs.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 7 cases, 1975–2008 · leading case: Atl. Sea Island Grp. LLC v. Connaughton, 592 F. Supp. 2d 1 (D.D.C. 2008).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Atl. Sea Island Grp. LLC v. Connaughton, 592 F. Supp. 2d 1 (D.D.C. 2008). · cites it 5× “By contrast, the defendants maintain that the Secretary reserved the authority to make an adjacent coastal state designation under 49 C.F.R. § 1.44 (o) until he delegated such authority to the Administrator in 2003 by repealing § 1.”
Nolan v. United States, 44 Fed. Cl. 49 (Fed. Cl. 1999). · cites it 5× “See 49 C.F.R. § 1.44 (m)(4) (1991); U.S. Dep’t of Transportation, Organization Manual, at 1—19 (DOT 1100.”
Tahoe Reg'l Plan. Agency v. King, 91 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 7290 (Cal. Ct. App. 1991). “( 49 C.F.R. § 1.44 ( j) (1982).)” ( 882 F.2d at p.”
Ashwood Manor Civic Ass'n v. Dole, 619 F. Supp. 52 (E.D. Pa. 1985). “305 at 22-28; 49 C.F.R. § 1.44 . The subsequent orders of the Federal Highway Administrátor and the superior orders of the Secretary of Transportation clearly supersede this inconsistent provision.”
Sierra Club v. Larson, 882 F.2d 128 (4th Cir. 1989). “49 C.F.R. § 1.44 (j) (1982). The regulations authorize the FHWA Administrator to delegate to Division and Regional offices the initial duty to make investigations and consult with state officials when violations are suspected.”
United States v. Day, 1 M.J. 1167 (1975). “In 49 CFR 1.44 he reserves certain specific powers.”
United States v. McDonald Chevrolet & Oldsmobile, Inc., 514 F. Supp. 83 (N.D. Ga. 1981). “It contends that the NHTSA lacks standing to bring this suit because the Secretary of the DOT, in 49 C.F.R. § 1.44 (d), specifically reserved the authority to “appear before the courts.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.