The Office of Drug & Alcohol Policy & Compliance advises the Secretary on national and international drug testing and control issues and is the principal advisor to the Secretary on rules related to the drug and alcohol testing of safety-sensitive transportation employees in aviation, trucking, railroads, mass transit, pipelines, and other transportation industries. The Office, in coordination with the Office of the General Counsel, publishes and provides interpretations of rules related to 49 CFR part 40 on the conduct of drug and alcohol tests, including how to conduct tests, and which procedures to use when testing. The Office coordinates with Federal Agencies and assists foreign governments in developing drug and alcohol testing programs and implementing the President's National Drug Control Strategy.
Notes of Decisions
MCI Sales & Serv., Inc. v. Hinton, 329 S.W.3d 475 (Tex. 2010).
· cites it 2× “49 C.F.R. § 1.50 . Over the years, NHTSA has promulgated and modified the Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standards (FMVSS), of which FMVSS 205 and 208 are at issue here.”
Freightliner Corp. v. Myrick, 514 U.S. 280 (1995).
“49 CFR § 1.50 (a) (1994). In 1970, the predecessor to NHTSA issued regulations concerning vehicles equipped with air brakes, which are used in trucks and tractor-trailers.”
Kia Motors Corp. v. Ruiz, 432 S.W.3d 865 (Tex. 2014).
“1 (citing 49 C.F.R. § 1.50 (a) (2008)). . The injury criteria measure, inter alia, "forces and accelerations” involving the head, chest, and upper leg during the crash.”
Winzler v. Toyota Motor Sales U.S.A., Inc, 681 F.3d 1208 (10th Cir. 2012).
“§§ 30120 (c)-(e), 30165(a); 49 C.F.R. § 1.50 (a). Given all this, there remains not enough value left for the courts to add in this case to warrant carrying on with the business of deciding its merits.”
Ctr. for Auto Saf., Inc. v. Nat'l High. Traffic Saf. Admin., 342 F. Supp. 2d 1 (D.D.C. 2004).
· cites it 2× “49 C.F.R. § 1.50 (a). II. Statutory Framework The Safety Act seeks to ensure the safety of motor vehicles, and it authorizes the Secretary of Transportation to undertake various activities to that end.”
Peter v. Ford Motor Co., 913 N.E.2d 311 (Ind. Ct. App. 2009).
“In its motion for summary judgment, Ford cited generally Standard 208, but argued specifically that the visor warning was mandated.”
Bodine v. Graco, Inc., 533 F.3d 1145 (9th Cir. 2008).
“§ 32705 (a)(1), and the Secretary further delegates that authority to the National Highway Traffic Safety Administrator, 49 C.F.R. § 1.50 (f). 6 . The chief law enforcement officer of a state is also empowered to bring an action to recover for a violation of § 32710.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.