C.F.R. » Title 49 » PART 1—ORGANIZATION AND DELEGATION OF POWERS AND DUTIES › Subpart C—Office of Inspector General

49 C.F.R. § 1.73

Authority of Inspector General

Read at: eCFRecfr.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov CasesGoogle Scholar

The Inspector General shall report to and be under the general supervision of the Secretary and Deputy Secretary. The Inspector General has such authority as is provided by the Inspector General Act of 1978, as amended, and as is otherwise provided by law. Authorities provided to the Inspector General by law are reserved to the Inspector General. In accordance with the statutory intent of the Inspector General Act to create an independent and objective unit, the Inspector General is authorized to make such investigations and reports relating to the administration of the programs and operations of the Department as are, in the judgment of the Inspector General, necessary and desirable. Neither the Secretary nor the Deputy Secretary shall prevent or prohibit the Inspector General from initiating, carrying out, or completing any audit or investigation, or from issuing any subpoena during the course of any audit or investigation.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 10 cases, 2002–2018 · leading case: Darrell Andrews Trucking, Inc. v. Fed. Motor Carrier Saf. Admin., 296 F.3d 1120 (D.C. Cir. 2002).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Darrell Andrews Trucking, Inc. v. Fed. Motor Carrier Saf. Admin., 296 F.3d 1120 (D.C. Cir. 2002). · cites it 2× “49 C.F.R. § 1.73 . 1 Pursuant to Part 385 of *1123 its regulations, the FMCSA assigns motor carriers one of three possible safety ratings: “satisfactory,” “conditional,” or “unsatisfactory.”
Armstrong v. United States Fire Ins., 606 F. Supp. 2d 794 (E.D. Tenn. 2009). “49 C.F.R. 1.73(f). FMCSA received a petition for rulemaking from several insurance companies and the American Insurance Association to amend and to clarify form MCS-90.”
A.D. Transp. Express, Inc. v. United States of Am. Fed. Motor Carrier Saf. Admin., 290 F.3d 761 (6th Cir. 2002). “See 49 C.F.R. § 1.73 (delegating to the Administrator of the FMCSA the function and authority vested in the Secretary of the Department of Transportation by 49 U.”
M. Fortunoff of Westbury Corp. v. Peerless Ins., 432 F.3d 127 (2d Cir. 2005). “See 49 C.F.R. § 1.73 (a)(5) (2004). That agency, acting pursuant to the so-called “transition rule” in 49 U.”
Owner-Operator Indep. Drivers Ass'n v. Bulkmatic Transp. Co., 503 F. Supp. 2d 961 (N.D. Ill. 2007). “See 49 C.F.R. §§ 1.73 (a)(2), (6), (8). Bulkmatic is a regulated motor carrier that transports property in interstate commerce under authority issued by the DOT.”
Midwest Crane & Rigging, Inc. v. Fed. Motor Carrier Saf. Admin., 603 F.3d 837 (10th Cir. 2010). “See 49 C.F.R. §§ 385.5 , 385.7. II. The present petition for review stems from a dispute arising out of an FMCSA compliance review in response to a complaint.”
Commodity Carriers, Inc. v. Fed. Motor Carrier Admin., 434 F.3d 604 (D.C. Cir. 2006). “Pursuant to its delegated authority under 49 C.F.R. § 1.73 , the FMCSA has promulgated regulations governing hours of service, which regulations set limits on the number of consecutive hours a driver may operate, id.”
Tarabochia v. Dep't of Revenue, 18 Or. Tax 210 (Or. T.C. 2005). “49 CFR § 1.73 (a)(1). Pursuant to that delegation of authority, the FMCSA has acted in several ways relevant to this matter.”
Ezzell Trucking, Inc. v. Fed. Motor Carrier Saf. Admin., 309 F.3d 24 (D.C. Cir. 2002). “§ 31144 (b); 49 C.F.R. § 1.73 (h). Administration inspectors perform periodic *25 on-site compliance reviews, in which they assess points for regulatory violations and preventable accidents in six categories called “factors” — general, driver, operational, vehicle, hazardous…”
Starr Indem. & Liab. Co. v. YRC, Inc. (N.D. Ill. 2018). · cites it 4× “31136 and 31502; and 49 CFR 1.73”); with 49 C.F.R. Part 392 (Oct.”
— 49 C.F.R. § 1.73(f) — 1 case
Armstrong v. United States Fire Ins., 606 F. Supp. 2d 794 (E.D. Tenn. 2009). “49 C.F.R. 1.73(f). FMCSA received a petition for rulemaking from several insurance companies and the American Insurance Association to amend and to clarify form MCS-90.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.