C.F.R. » Title 49 » CHAPTER X—SURFACE TRANSPORTATION BOARD › SUBCHAPTER B—RULES OF PRACTICE › PART 1105—PROCEDURES FOR IMPLEMENTATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL LAWS

49 C.F.R. § 1105.1

Purpose

Read at: eCFRecfr.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov CasesGoogle Scholar

These rules are designed to assure adequate consideration of environmental and energy factors in the Board's decisionmaking process pursuant to the National Environmental Policy Act, 42 U.S.C. 4332; the Energy Policy and Conservation Act, 42 U.S.C. 6362(b); and related laws, including the National Historic Preservation Act, 16 U.S.C. 470f, the Coastal Zone Management Act, 16 U.S.C. 1451, and the Endangered Species Act, 16 U.S.C. 1531.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 3 cases, 1998–2017 · leading case: Friends of Eel River v. North Coast Ry. Auth., 399 P.3d 37 (Cal. 2017).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Friends of Eel River v. North Coast Ry. Auth., 399 P.3d 37 (Cal. 2017). “( 49 C.F.R §§ 1105.1 - 1105.12 (2016) ; see especially id .”
Soo Line R.R. v. City of Minneapolis, 38 F. Supp. 2d 1096 (D. Minnesota 1998). “See 49 C.F.R. § 1105.1 ("These rules are designed to assure adequate consideration of environmental and energy factors in the Board's decisionmaking process pursuant to the National Environmental Policy Act .”
Flynn v. Burlington N. Santa Fe Corp.(BNSF), 98 F. Supp. 2d 1186 (E.D. Wash. 2000). “See, 49 C.F.R. § 1105.1 . Accordingly, Plaintiffs cannot raise a claim under NEPA or the ICCTA so no federal question jurisdiction exists.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.