U.S. Code » Title 16 » Chapter CHAPTER 1A— HISTORIC SITES, BUILDINGS, OBJECTS, AND ANTIQUITIES › Subchapter SUBCHAPTER II— NATIONAL HISTORIC PRESERVATION › Part Part A— Programs

16 U.S.C. § 470f

Repealed. Pub. L. 113–287, § 7, Dec. 19, 2014, 128 Stat. 3272

Read at: OLRCuscode.house.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov JustiaTitle 16 CasesGoogle Scholar

[repealed]

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 286 cases (2 in the last 5 years), 1969–2022 · leading case: CTIA—Wireless Ass'n v. Fed. Commc'ns Comm'n, 466 F.3d 105 (D.C. Cir. 2006).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
CTIA—Wireless Ass'n v. Fed. Commc'ns Comm'n, 466 F.3d 105 (D.C. Cir. 2006). · cites it 8× “GRIFFITH, Circuit Judge: CTIA-The Wireless Association (“CTIA”) challenges an order of the Federal Communications Commission (1) determining that the construction of wireless communications towers is an “undertaking” subject to section 106 of the National Historic Preservation…”
Weintraub v. Rural Electrification Admin., 457 F. Supp. 78 (M.D. Penn. 1978). · cites it 24× “(AEC) have violated 16 U.S.C. § 470f by planning to and beginning the demolition of the Telegraph Building which is located at 214r-216 Locust Street, Harrisburg, Pennsylvania.”
California Wilderness Coalition v. U.S. Dep't of Energy, 631 F.3d 1072 (9th Cir. 2011). · cites it 4× “" Petitioners also contend that DOE violated the National Historical Preservation Act ("NHPA") by failing to comply with 16 U.S.C. § 470f, which requires that it accept comments from certain entities, including the Advisory Council on Historic Preservation ("ACHP"), prior to the…”
Lyng v. Nw. Indian Cemetery Prot. Assn., 485 U.S. 439 (1988). · cites it 2× “[5] Thus, for example, agencies proposing to use or permit activities on federal lands must comply with various public notice, consultation, and impact evaluation requirements imposed by the National Historic Preservation Act, 16 U. S. C. §§ 470f, 470h-2(f); the Archaeological…”
Friends of the Atglen-Susquehanna Trail, Inc. v. Surface Transp. Bd. & United States of Am., 252 F.3d 246 (3rd Cir. 2001). · cites it 4× “FAST challenges the manner in which the STB carried out its responsibilities under § 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act (NHPA), 16 U.S.C. § 470f. In particular, FAST objects to the manner in which the STB identified and protected historic properties along the line, to…”
Newburyport Redevelopment Auth. v. Commonwealth, 401 N.E.2d 118 (Mass. App. Ct. 1980). · cites it 7× “On some undisclosed date thereafter HUD, apparently pursuant to 16 U.S.C. § 470f (1976) (§ 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act of 1966), 16 but perhaps pursuant to 42 U.”
Save Our Heritage, Inc. v. Fed. Aviation Admin., 269 F.3d 49 (1st Cir. 2001). · cites it 2× “It also concluded that the categorical exclusion under NEPA obviated the need for consultation under Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act of 1966 (“NHPA”), 16 U.S.C. § 470f (1994). The Advisory Council on Historic Preservation, which is authorized to enforce…”
Valley Cmty. Pres. Comm'n v. Mineta, 373 F.3d 1078 (10th Cir. 2004). · cites it 3× “Section 4(f) and Section 106 All federally funded highway projects must comply with a number of federal environmental protection and historic preservation laws, including Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act, 16 U.S.C. § 470f; Section 4(f) of the Department of…”
Te-Moak Tribe of W. Shoshone v. United States Dep't of Interior, 608 F.3d 592 (9th Cir. 2010). · cites it 2× “” 16 U.S.C. § 470f. Like NEPA, “[section 106 of NHPA is a ‘stop, look, and listen’ provision that requires each federal agency to consider the effects of its programs.”
Carlos Romero-Barcelo, Etc. v. Harold Brown, 643 F.2d 835 (1st Cir. 1981). · cites it 3× “Does the Navy’s survey of historical sites on Vieques satisfy the requirements of § 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act, 16 U.S.C. § 470f, Executive Order 11593 and 36 C.”
Coalition for Underground Expansion v. Mineta, 333 F.3d 193 (D.C. Cir. 2003). “16 U.S.C. § 470f. 4 .Section 4(f) ofDOTA provides in part: (c) The Secretary may approve a transportation program or project (other than any project for a park road or parkway under section 204 of title 23) requiring the use of publicly owned land of a public park, recreation…”
Vieux Carre Prop. Owners, Residents & Assocs., Inc. v. Colonel Lloyd Kent Brown, Etc., 875 F.2d 453 (5th Cir. 1989). · cites it 3× “§§ 320 through 330 (1987), require the Corps to issue a permit for the aquarium phase of the project, and that such permitting in turn requires the Corps to submit the project to the NHPA historic impact review process dictated by 16 U.S.C. §§ 470f and 470h-2(f). The Vieux Carre…”
Show all 286 citing cases →
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.