49 C.F.R. § 213.101
Scope
This subpart prescribes minimum requirements for ballast, crossties, track assembly fittings, and the physical conditions of rails.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 6
cases (1 in the last 5 years), 2009–2025 · leading case: CSX Transp., Inc. v. Miller, 46 So. 3d 434 (Ala. 2010).
CSX Transp., Inc. v. Miller, 46 So. 3d 434 (Ala. 2010). “[1] Miller also alleged a violation of 49 C.F.R. § 213.101 et seq., asserting that CSX had failed to provide adequate track support.”
Rooney v. City of Philadelphia, 623 F. Supp. 2d 644 (E.D. Pa. 2009). “” 49 C.F.R. § 213.101 . Ballast materials are governed under 49 C.”
Charles Harris v. Norfolk S. Ry. Co., 784 F.3d 954 (4th Cir. 2015). “” 49 C.F.R. § 213.101 (2009). The regulation, however, does not define “visual!] inspection],” and we therefore give those words their ordinary meaning.”
CSX Transp., Inc. v. Pitts, 38 A.3d 445 (Md. Ct. Spec. App. 2012). “” 49 C.F.R. § 213.101 . 49 C.F.R. § 213.103 , on its face, does not require the use of ballast in rail yard areas or mention the safety of walking surfaces for railroad employees.”
Tubbs v. BNSF Ry. Co., 562 S.W.3d 323 (Mo. Ct. App. 2018). “49 C.F.R. § 213.101 . In interpreting the meaning of § 213.”
Sean Van Buren v. Kansas City S. Ry. Co. (La. 2025). “49 C.F.R. § 213.101 , et seq., “prescribes minimum requirements for ballast, crossties, track assembly and the physical conditions of rails.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.