49 C.F.R. § 217.1
Purpose
Through the requirements of this part, the Federal Railroad Administration learns the condition of operating rules and practices with respect to trains and other rolling equipment in the railroad industry, and each railroad is required to instruct its employees in operating practices.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 8
cases, 2006–2020 · leading case: Michael Ryder v. Union Pac. R.R. Com, 945 F.3d 194 (5th Cir. 2019).
Michael Ryder v. Union Pac. R.R. Com, 945 F.3d 194 (5th Cir. 2019). “Although that regulation subsumes the subject matter of horn blasting in emergency situ- ations, it does not impose a duty or even suggest that a railroad instruct its engineer on a precise horn sequence.”
Norfolk S. Ry. Co. v. Zeagler, 748 S.E.2d 846 (Ga. 2013). “See 49 CFR § 217.1 (stating the purpose of the regulations in Part 217).”
Carter v. Nat'l R.R. Passenger, 63 F. Supp. 3d 1118 (N.D. Cal. 2014). “According to Plaintiffs, under 49 CFR §§ 217.1 and 217.11 Amtrak must instruct, test, and promote/require compliance with its operating rules.”
Thompson v. Ne. Illinois Reg'l Commuter R.R., 854 N.E.2d 744 (Ill. App. Ct. 2006). “, 49 C.F.R. §§217.1 , 240.123 (2005)). Federal regulations provide that inspectors will “determine the extent to which the railroads, shippers, and manufacturers have fulfilled their obligations with respect to inspection, maintenance, training, and supervision.”
Olberding v. Union Pac. R.R., 454 F. Supp. 2d 884 (W.D. Mo. 2006). “214 (design of railroad crossing warning devices); 49 C.F.R. § 217.1 et seq. (railroad employee safety training); 49 C.”
Sullivan v. Davidson Trucking Inc (N.D. Ala. 2020). “In failing to appropriately instruct, supervise and monitor its employees as required by 49 C.F.R. §§ 217.1 and 218.11. e. In traveling at an excessive speed and a speed greater than the established timetable speed and/or slow speed in effect at the time of the collision.”
Sullivan v. Davidson Trucking Inc (N.D. Ala. 2020). “In failing to appropriately instruct, supervise and monitor its employees as required by 49 C.F.R. §§ 217.1 and 218.11. e. In traveling at an excessive speed and a speed greater than the established timetable speed and/or slow speed in effect at the time of the collision.”
Gillenwater v. Burlington N. & Santa Fe, 435 F. Supp. 2d 959 (E.D. Mo. 2006). “214 (design of railroad crossing warning devices); 49 C.F.R. § 217.1 et seq. (railroad employee safety training); 49 C.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.