C.F.R. » Title 49 » PART 24—UNIFORM RELOCATION ASSISTANCE AND REAL PROPERTY ACQUISITION FOR FEDERAL AND FEDERALLY ASSISTED PROGRAMS › Subpart A—General

49 C.F.R. § 24.9

Recordkeeping and reports

Read at: eCFRecfr.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov CasesGoogle Scholar

(a) Records. The agency shall maintain adequate records of its acquisition and displacement activities in sufficient detail to demonstrate compliance with this part. These records shall be retained for at least 3 years after each owner of a property and each person displaced from the property receives the final payment to which he or she is entitled under this part, or in accordance with the applicable regulations of the Federal funding agency, whichever is later.

(b) Confidentiality of records. Records maintained by an agency in accordance with this part are confidential regarding their use as public information, unless applicable law provides otherwise.

(c) Reports. Each Federal agency that has programs or projects requiring the acquisition of real property or causing a displacement from real property subject to the provisions of the Uniform Act shall provide to the Lead Agency an annual summary report by November 15 that describes the real property acquisitions, displacements, and related activities conducted by the Federal agency for the prior calendar year. (See appendix A to this part, section 24.9(c).)

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 7 cases (1 in the last 5 years), 2003–2023 · leading case: City of Reno v. Reno Gazette-Journal, 63 P.3d 1147 (Nev. 2003).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
City of Reno v. Reno Gazette-Journal, 63 P.3d 1147 (Nev. 2003). · cites it 12× “49 C.F.R. § 24.9 (b) The federal Act provides that "[t]he head of the lead agency shall .”
State Ex Rel. State Dep't of Transp., Div. of Highways v. Cookman, 639 S.E.2d 693 (W. Va. 2006). · cites it 36× “49 C.F.R. § 24.9 (a) requires a government agency [9] that acquires real property to maintain records to establish its compliance with the Federal Act.”
State ex rel. West Virginia Dep't of Transp. v. Reed, 724 S.E.2d 320 (W. Va. 2012). · cites it 12× “14 To support its argument, DOH cites to 49 C.F.R. § 24.9 (2010). Under 49 C.F.R. § 24.”
State Ex Rel. West Virginia Dept. of Trans. v. Reed, 724 S.E.2d 320 (W. Va. 2012). · cites it 12× “Federal law requires appraisal reports remain confidential. DOH argues that federal law does not permit the disclosure of appraisal reports as ordered by the trial court.”
City of Sparks Vs. Reno Newspapers, Inc., 2017 NV 56 (Nev. 2017). · cites it 2× “010, even if the federal regulation was not expressly listed as an exception under NRS 239.”
South Coast v. Ag-Weld CA5 (Cal. Ct. App. 2023). · cites it 2× “[Government Code] section 6254 (k) and 49 CFR section 24.9, the records you have requested have been defined as confidential and are therefore exempt from release.”
City of Sparks Vs. Reno Newspapers, Inc., 2017 NV 56 (Nev. 2017). “010, even if the federal regulation was not expressly listed as an exception under NRS 239.”
— 49 C.F.R. § 24.9(a) — 1 case
State Ex Rel. State Dep't of Transp., Div. of Highways v. Cookman, 639 S.E.2d 693 (W. Va. 2006). “49 C.F.R. § 24.9 (a) requires a government agency [9] that acquires real property to maintain records to establish its compliance with the Federal Act.”
— 49 C.F.R. § 24.9(b) — 2 cases
State Ex Rel. State Dep't of Transp., Div. of Highways v. Cookman, 639 S.E.2d 693 (W. Va. 2006). “49 C.F.R. § 24.9 (a) requires a government agency [9] that acquires real property to maintain records to establish its compliance with the Federal Act.”
City of Sparks Vs. Reno Newspapers, Inc., 2017 NV 56 (Nev. 2017). “010, even if the federal regulation was not expressly listed as an exception under NRS 239.”
— 49 C.F.R. § 24.9(e) — 1 case
State Ex Rel. State Dep't of Transp., Div. of Highways v. Cookman, 639 S.E.2d 693 (W. Va. 2006). “49 C.F.R. § 24.9 (a) requires a government agency [9] that acquires real property to maintain records to establish its compliance with the Federal Act.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.