49 C.F.R. § 28.110

Self-evaluation

Read at: eCFRecfr.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov CasesGoogle Scholar

(a) The Department shall, by one year of the effective date of this part, evaluate its current policies and practices, and effects thereof, that do not or may not meet the requirements of this part, and, to the extent modification of any such policies and practices is required, the Department shall proceed to make the necessary modifications.

(b) The Department shall provide an opportunity to interested persons, including individuals with handicaps, agency employees with handicaps, and organizations representing individuals with handicaps, to participate in the self-evaluation process by submitting comments (both oral and written).

(c) The Department shall, until at least three years following completion of the evaluation required under paragraph (a) of this section, or until such time as all modifications identified by the self-evaluation to be necessary to comply with section 504 have been completed, whichever occurs later, maintain on file and make available for public inspection—

(1) A description of areas examined, regulations and nonregulatory criteria reviewed, and any problems identified; and

(2) A description of any modifications made.

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 1 case, 2011–2011 · leading case: Oliver v. Ralphs Grocery Co., 654 F.3d 903 (9th Cir. 2011).

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

Oliver v. Ralphs Grocery Co., 654 F.3d 903 (9th Cir. 2011). · cites it 3× “See 49 C.F.R. § 28.110 . Third, he argues that because the Secretary of Transportation has approved the California MUTCD as being in “substantial conformance” with the federal MUTCD, the state standard likewise qualifies as a regulation promulgated pursuant to the Rehabilitation…”

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.