5 C.F.R. § 1810.1
Investigative policy in certain discrimination and retaliation complaints
OSC is authorized to investigate allegations of discrimination and retaliation prohibited by law, as defined in 5 U.S.C. 2302(b)(1) and (b)(9)(A)(ii). Because procedures for investigating discrimination and retaliation complaints have already been established in the agencies and the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, OSC will usually avoid duplicating those procedures and will defer to those procedures rather than initiating an independent investigation.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 3
cases, 1992–2012 · leading case: Farris v. Shinseki, 762 F. Supp. 2d 141 (D. Me. 2011).
Farris v. Shinseki, 762 F. Supp. 2d 141 (D. Me. 2011). “5 C.F.R. § 1810.1 (2010). Ms. Farris has not explained why filing with the OSC, which defers to EEOC procedures, excuses her from complying with EEOC procedures.”
Stanton v. Reukauf (D.D.C. 2012). “5 C.F.R. § 1810.1 . If you wish to report allegations of discrimination based upon race, color, religion, sex, national origin, age, or handicapping condition, or reprisal for filing an EEO complaint, you should contact your agency’s EEO office immediately.”
Spruill v. Merit Sys. Prot. Bd., 978 F.3d 679 (Fed. Cir. 1992). “5 C.F.R. § 1810.1 . (Emphasis added). Spruill then petitioned the MSPB for review of his three-day suspension pursuant to the provisions of § 1221, the Individual Right of Action (IRA) provision.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.