C.F.R. » Title 5 » CHAPTER XIV—FEDERAL LABOR RELATIONS AUTHORITY, GENERAL COUNSEL OF THE FEDERAL LABOR RELATIONS AUTHORITY AND FEDERAL SERVICE IMPASSES PANEL › SUBCHAPTER C—FEDERAL LABOR RELATIONS AUTHORITY AND GENERAL COUNSEL OF THE FEDERAL LABOR RELATIONS AUTHORITY › PART 2425—REVIEW OF ARBITRATION AWARDS

5 C.F.R. § 2425.1

Applicability of this part

Read at: eCFRecfr.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov CasesGoogle Scholar

This part applies to all arbitration cases in which exceptions are filed with the Authority, pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 7122, on or after August 29, 2025.

[90 FR 42132, Aug. 29, 2025]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 3 cases, 1985–1993 · leading case: Am. Fed'n of Gov't Employees, Afl-Cio, Local 3090 v. Fed. Labor Relations Auth., 777 F.2d 751 (D.C. Cir. 1985).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Am. Fed'n of Gov't Employees, Afl-Cio, Local 3090 v. Fed. Labor Relations Auth., 777 F.2d 751 (D.C. Cir. 1985). · cites it 2× “See also, 5 C.F.R. § 2425.1 (b) (1982). Subsequent to the events recounted in this opinion Congress amended the statute to provide that the 30-day period would run from the date on which the arbitrator’s award was served on the party filing exceptions, Pub.”
Nat'l Ass'n of Gov't Employees v. Fed. Labor Relations Auth., 830 F. Supp. 889 (E.D. Va. 1993). “The Union then filed an opposition to the agency’s exceptions on September 4,1990, pursuant to 5 C.F.R. § 2425.1 (c). The exceptions and opposition were docketed as No.”
Am. Fed'n of Gov't Employees Local 1749 v. Fed. Labor Relations Auth., 842 F.2d 102 (5th Cir. 1988). “Laughlin Air Force Base filed exceptions, as permitted by 5 C.F.R. § 2425.1 . 3 The petitioner asserts that in February 1987 it made demand on the Air Force to pay the arbitrator’s award, and that the agency refused.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.