5 C.F.R. § 831.1703
Implementing directives
The Director may prescribe, in the form he or she deems appropriate, such detailed procedures as are necessary to carry out the purpose of this subpart.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 5
cases, 1983–1996 · leading case: Roth v. Roth, 604 A.2d 1033 (Pa. Super. Ct. 1992).
Roth v. Roth, 604 A.2d 1033 (Pa. Super. Ct. 1992). “Under 5 C.F.R. § 831.1703 , employee retirement benefits do not include lump sum benefits such as the one involved in this case.”
Heyda v. Heyda, 615 A.2d 1218 (Md. Ct. Spec. App. 1992). “” 5 C.F.R. § 831.1703 . A self-only annuity may be distinguished from a “gross annuity,” which the regulations define as “the amount of a self-only annuity less only the applicable survivor reduction, but before any other reduction.”
Boykin v. Boykin, 565 So. 2d 1109 (Miss. 1990). “…could deviate as requested, it was required to seek and receive permission from the other party ( i.e., William). See 5 C.F.R. § 831.1703 (b).”
Elizabeth McDannell v. United States Off. of Pers. Mgmt., 716 F.2d 1063 (5th Cir. 1983). “5 C.F.R. § 831.1703 (b). In keeping with this regulation, the OPM notified Mr.”
Endsley v. Endsley (In Re Endsley), 204 B.R. 242 (Bankr. M.D. Fla. 1996). “In July 1995, the Debtor instituted an adversary proceeding and sought a determination that the Louisiana Judgment was not “a qualified order” as that term is defined in the Code of Federal Regulations 5 C.F.R. § 831.1703 , and requested that this Court enter a Judgment…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.