5 C.F.R. § 831.501
Time for filing application
An employee or Member who is eligible for retirement must file a retirement application with his or her agency. A former employee or Member who is eligible for retirement must file a retirement application with OPM. The application should not be filed more than 60 days before becoming eligible for benefits. If the application is for disability retirement, the applicant and the employing agency should refer to subpart L of this part. If the application is for phased retirement status, the employee and the employing agency should refer to subpart Q of this part.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 9
cases, 1966–2013 · leading case: Elizabeth M. Parker v. Off. of Pers. Mgmt., 974 F.2d 164 (Fed. Cir. 1992).
Elizabeth M. Parker v. Off. of Pers. Mgmt., 974 F.2d 164 (Fed. Cir. 1992). “” 5 C.F.R. § 831.501 (a) & (c) (1992). In January 1990, OPM informed Parker that it was denying her application as untimely because it was not received until more than one year after her separation from service had elapsed, and that therefore it was not filed within the period…”
Stephen A. Arneson v. Margaret M. Heckler, Sec'y of Health & Human Servs., 879 F.2d 393 (8th Cir. 1989). “5 C.F.R. §§ 831.501 and 831.502. Nearly a year after his dis *396 charge, Ameson filed the necessary application and began receiving monthly benefits.”
Matter of Succession of Sims, 464 So. 2d 991 (La. Ct. App. 1985). “§ 8345 (b) and (i)(1); 5 C.F.R. § 831.501 (a & b); 5 C.F.R. § 831.”
Mrs. Frances B. Chafin v. Dr. Harry D. Pratt, 358 F.2d 349 (5th Cir. 1966). “§ 2257 (a) ; 5 CFR § 831.501 (d) ; Federal Personnel Manual Supplement No.”
Sys. Fuels, Inc. v. United States, 111 Fed. Cl. 381 (Fed. Cl. 2013). “1992) (disregarding the post hoc affidavit of an agency officer who asserted that the agency had a longstanding policy of interpreting 5 C.F.R. § 831.501 as imposing a deadline for the agency’s receipt of an application).”
Robert D. Hammond v. Off. of Pers. Mgmt., 784 F.2d 392 (Fed. Cir. 1986). “*396 Responding to an objection to 5 C.F.R. § 831.501 (d), which provides that an employee’s application for disability retirement shall not preclude or delay any other appropriate personnel action by the employing agency, OPM stated that the “provision was added to clarify that…”
Peele v. United States, 3 Cl. Ct. 419 (Ct. Cl. 1983). “5 C.F.R. 831.501(c) (1978). . No decision was issued by the Federal Employee Appeals Authority prior to the January 11, 1979 effective date of the Civil Service Reform Act of 1978, Pub.”
Nat'l Post Off. Mail Handlers v. United States Postal Serv., 657 F. Supp. 295 (D. Colo. 1987). “Under 5 C.F.R. § 831.501 (c) (1983), Mr. Cavanagh could have filed an application for disability benefits up to a year following his separation from the Postal Service.”
Roxie P. Jones v. United States of Am., Civil Serv. Comm'n, 680 F.2d 1138 (7th Cir. 1982). “” 5 C.F.R. § 831.501 , (revised as of January 1, 1964).”
— 5 C.F.R. § 831.501(c) — 1 case
Peele v. United States, 3 Cl. Ct. 419 (Ct. Cl. 1983). “5 C.F.R. 831.501(c) (1978). . No decision was issued by the Federal Employee Appeals Authority prior to the January 11, 1979 effective date of the Civil Service Reform Act of 1978, Pub.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.