7 C.F.R. § 1001.72

Payments from the producer—settlement fund

Read at: eCFRecfr.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov CasesGoogle Scholar

No later than the day after the due date required for payment to the Market Administrator pursuant to § 1001.71 (except as provided in § 1001.90), the Market Administrator shall pay to each handler the amount, if any, by which the amount computed pursuant to § 1001.71(b) exceeds the amount computed pursuant to § 1001.71(a). If, at such time, the balance in the producer-settlement fund is insufficient to make all payments pursuant to this section, the Market Administrator shall reduce uniformly such payments and shall complete the payments as soon as the funds are available.

[70 FR 18963, Apr. 12, 2005]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 3 cases, 1968–1974 · leading case: Frederick T. Zuber v. Russell Allen, Orville Freeman, Sec'y of Agric. v. Russell Allen, 402 F.2d 660 (D.C. Cir. 1968).
Frederick T. Zuber v. Russell Allen, Orville Freeman, Sec'y of Agric. v. Russell Allen, 402 F.2d 660 (D.C. Cir. 1968). “Their expectations cannot seriously be said to encompass a decision to that effect by a Court of Appeals but not by a District Court.”
Cranston v. Hardin, 504 F.2d 566 (2d Cir. 1974). “In Zuber several Vermont dairy farmers had challenged the validity of the 'nearby' price differential in the Massachusetts-Rhode Island Milk Marketing Order, see 7 C.F.R. 1001.72 (1968). The Supreme Court, upholding judgments of the district and circuit courts invalidating the…”
Cranston v. Hardin, 504 F.2d 566 (2d Cir. 1974). “In Zuber several Vermont dairy farmers had challenged the validity of the “nearby” price differential in the Massaehusetts-Rhode Island Milk Marketing Order, see 7 C.F.R. § 1001.72 (1968). The Supreme Court, upholding judgments of the district and circuit courts invalidating the…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.