(a) This part sets forth procedures for proceedings before the National Appeals Division within the Department. The Division is an organization within the Department, subject to the general supervision of and policy direction by the Secretary, which is independent from all other agencies and offices of the Department, including Department officials at the state and local level. The Director of the Division reports directly to the Secretary of Agriculture. The authority of the Hearing Officers and the Director of the Division, and the administrative appeal procedures which must be followed by program participants who desire to appeal an adverse decision and by the agency which issued the adverse decision, are included in this part.
(b) Pursuant to section 212(e) of the Federal Crop Insurance Reform and Department of Agriculture Reorganization Act of 1994, Pub. L. 103-354 (the Act), 7 U.S.C. 6912(e), program participants shall seek review of an adverse decision before a Hearing Officer of the Division, and may seek further review by the Director, under the provisions of this part prior to seeking judicial review.
Notes of Decisions
Mahon v. United States Dep't of Agric., 485 F.3d 1247 (11th Cir. 2007).
· cites it 2× “The NAD’s regulations do require claimants to exhaust the NAD’s administrative appeal procedures prior to seeking judicial review, 7 C.F.R. §§ 11.2 (b), 11.13(b) (2002), *1256 and the regulations require claimants to state the reasons why the adverse decision was incorrect at…”
Care Net Pregnancy Ctr. v. United States Dep't of Agric., 896 F. Supp. 2d 98 (D.D.C. 2012).
· cites it 3× “7 C.F.R. § 11.2 (b) (emphasis added). 2. Regulations Governing the USDA’s Funding of Faith-Based Organizations The USDA implemented regulations in 2004 setting forth “USDA policy regarding equal opportunity for religious organizations to participate in USDA assistance programs…”
Huff v. Vilsack, 195 F. Supp. 3d 343 (D.D.C. 2016).
“Notably, the NAD is independent from all other parts of the USDA, see 7 C.F.R. § 11.2 , and among its tasks, the NAD handles complaints related to RD’s administration of the Section 515 program, id.”
Ballanger v. Johanns, 495 F.3d 866 (8th Cir. 2007).
“” 7 C.F.R. § 11.2 . The regulations provide for informal review or mediation prior to the filing of a formal appeal, id.”
Enter. Nat'l Bank v. Vilsack, 568 F.3d 229 (D.C. Cir. 2009).
“” 7 C.F.R. § 11.2 (a). The Division is headed by a director who "reports directly to the [Agriculture] Secretary.”
Horn Farms, Inc. v. Veneman, 319 F. Supp. 2d 902 (N.D. Ind. 2004).
“7 C.F.R. § 11.2 (b)(emphasis added). IV. STANDARD OF REVIEW Both parties in this action have moved for summary judgment pursuant to Fed.”
Bastek v. Fed. Crop Ins., 145 F.3d 90 (2d Cir. 1998).
· cites it 2× “” 7 C.F.R. § 11.2 (b). In general, exhaustion of administrative remedies is the rule, and waiver ■ the exception, because exhaustion serves myriad purposes, including limiting judicial interference in agency affairs, conserving judicial resources, and preventing the “frequent…”
John Ballanger, Jr. v. Mike Johanns (8th Cir. 2007).
“” 7 C.F.R. § 11.2 . The regulations provide for informal review or mediation prior to the filing of a formal appeal, id.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.