7 C.F.R. § 1126.14

Other source milk

Read at: eCFRecfr.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov CasesGoogle Scholar

See § 1000.14.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 2 cases, 1996–1996 · leading case: Gore, Inc., D/B/A Pure Milk Co. v. Michael Espy, as Sec'y of U.S. Dep't of Agric., 87 F.3d 767 (5th Cir. 1996).
Gore, Inc., D/B/A Pure Milk Co. v. Michael Espy, as Sec'y of U.S. Dep't of Agric., 87 F.3d 767 (5th Cir. 1996). · cites it 2× “Although Gore could sell its milk at any price due to its status as a producer-handler, the record reflects that Gore sold its milk at a premium over the Class I minimum price. 16 . The PDC has its own receiving and loading docks and is managed separately.”
Gore, Inc. v. Espy (5th Cir. 1996). · cites it 2× “3 value use it must pay the difference into the producer-settlement fund. Gore is a vertically integrated milk producer, owning a dairy, a processing plant, and a packaging facility.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.