7 C.F.R. § 1467.12

The WRPO development

Read at: eCFRecfr.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov CasesGoogle Scholar

(a) The development of the WRPO will be made through the local NRCS representative, in consultation with the State Technical Committee, with consideration of site-specific technical input from FWS and the Conservation District.

(b) The WRPO will specify the manner in which the enrolled land shall be restored, protected, enhanced, maintained, and managed to accomplish the goals of the program. The WRPO will be developed to ensure that cost-effective restoration and maximization of wildlife benefits and wetland functions and values will result. Specifically, the WRPO will consider and address, to the extent practicable, the on-site alternations and the off-site watershed conditions that adversely impact the hydrology and associated wildlife and wetland functions and values. NRCS will review, revise, and supplement the WRPO as needed throughout the duration of the enrollment to ensure that program goals are fully and effectively achieved.

[74 FR 2328, Jan. 15, 2009, as amended at 74 FR 26285, June 2, 2009]

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 3 cases, 2003–2020 · leading case: Big Meadows Grazing Ass'n v. United States, 344 F.3d 940 (9th Cir. 2003).

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

Big Meadows Grazing Ass'n v. United States, 344 F.3d 940 (9th Cir. 2003). “Finally, we turn to 7 C.F.R. § 1467.12 (b) (2003), which specifies in relevant part, “Modifications to the WRPO which are substantial and affect provisions of the easement will require agreement from the landowner and require execution of an amended easement.”

Roath v. United States, 843 F. Supp. 2d 944 (E.D. Wis. 2011). · cites it 3× “7 C.F.R. § 1467.12 . It states: The WRPO will specify the manner in which the enrolled land will be restored, protected, enhanced, maintained, and managed to accomplish the goals of the program.”

Landgraf v. United States (Fed. Cl. 2020). “” 7 C.F.R. § 1467.12 (b); WRP Manual § 514.”

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.