7 C.F.R. § 205.402

Review of application

Read at: eCFRecfr.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov CasesGoogle Scholar

(a) Upon acceptance of an application for certification, a certifying agent must:

(1) Review the application to ensure completeness pursuant to § 205.401;

(2) Determine by a review of the application materials whether the applicant appears to comply or may be able to comply with the applicable requirements of subpart C of this part;

(3) Verify that an applicant who previously applied to another certifying agent and received a notification of noncompliance or denial of certification, pursuant to § 205.405, has submitted documentation to support the correction of any noncompliances identified in the notification of noncompliance or denial of certification, as required in § 205.405(e); and

(4) Schedule an on-site inspection of the operation to determine whether the applicant qualifies for certification if the review of application materials reveals that the production or handling operation may be in compliance with the applicable requirements of subpart C of this part.

(b) The certifying agent shall within a reasonable time:

(1) Review the application materials received and communicate its findings to the applicant;

(2) Provide the applicant with a copy of the on-site inspection report, as approved by the certifying agent, for any on-site inspection performed; and

(3) Provide the applicant with a copy of the test results for any samples taken by an inspector.

(c) The applicant may withdraw its application at any time. An applicant who withdraws its application shall be liable for the costs of services provided up to the time of withdrawal of its application. An applicant that voluntarily withdrew its application prior to the issuance of a notice of noncompliance will not be issued a notice of noncompliance. Similarly, an applicant that voluntarily withdrew its application prior to the issuance of a notice of certification denial will not be issued a notice of certification denial.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 2 cases, 2018–2018 · leading case: Marentette v. Abbott Labs., Inc., 886 F.3d 112 (2d Cir. 2018).
Marentette v. Abbott Labs., Inc., 886 F.3d 112 (2d Cir. 2018). “See 7 C.F.R. §§ 205.402 (a)(4), 205.403. If the certifying agent confirms that the applicant's operation complies with its proposed organic plan, the applicant is certified and may begin selling and labeling products made under that plan as organic, subject to annual…”
Marenette v. Abbott Labs. (2d Cir. 2018). “See 7 C.F.R. §§ 205.402 (a)(4), 205.403. If the certifying agent confirms 13 that the applicant’s operation complies with its proposed organic plan, the 14 applicant is certified and may begin selling and labeling products made under 15 that plan as organic, subject to annual…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.