C.F.R. » Title 7 » CHAPTER I—AGRICULTURAL MARKETING SERVICE (STANDARDS, INSPECTIONS, MARKETING PRACTICES), DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE › SUBCHAPTER C—REQUIREMENTS AND STANDARDS UNDER THE AGRICULTURAL MARKETING ACT OF 1946 AND THE EGG PRODUCTS INSPECTION ACT › PART 66—NATIONAL BIOENGINEERED FOOD DISCLOSURE STANDARD › Subpart B—Bioengineered Food Disclosure

7 C.F.R. § 66.118

Other claims

Read at: eCFRecfr.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov CasesGoogle Scholar

Nothing in this subpart will prohibit regulated entities from making other claims regarding bioengineered foods, provided that such claims are consistent with applicable Federal law.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 2 cases (2 in the last 5 years), 2022–2025 · leading case: Nat. Grocers v. Perdue (N.D. Cal. 2022).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Nat. Grocers v. Perdue (N.D. Cal. 2022). · cites it 2× “at 65852; 7 C.F.R. § 66.118 ; see also Dkt. No. 56 at 28 (government brief 26 acknowledging same).”
Nat. Grocers v. Brooke Rollins (9th Cir. 2025). “at 65852; see also 7 C.F.R. § 66.118 , they can satisfy the disclosure requirement only by using the term “bioengineered.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.