7 C.F.R. § 780.3
Reservations of authority
(a) Representatives of FSA and CCC may correct all errors in data entered on program contracts, loan agreements, and other program documents and the results of the computations or calculations made pursuant to the contract or agreement. FSA and CCC will furnish appropriate notice of such corrections when corrections are deemed necessary.
(b) Nothing contained in this part shall preclude the Secretary, or the Administrator of FSA, Executive Vice President of CCC, the Chief of NRCS, if applicable, or a designee, from determining at any time any question arising under the programs within their respective authority or from reversing or modifying any decision made by a subordinate employee of FSA or its county and State committees, or CCC.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 13
cases, 1967–1995 · leading case: Patrick Esch v. Clayton K. Yeutter, Sec'y, U.S. Dep't of Agric., 876 F.2d 976 (D.C. Cir. 1989).
Patrick Esch v. Clayton K. Yeutter, Sec'y, U.S. Dep't of Agric., 876 F.2d 976 (D.C. Cir. 1989). “7 C.F.R. §§ 780.3 , 780.4, 780.5. 171 . 7 C.”
Don Olenhouse v. Commodity Credit Corp., 42 F.3d 1560 (10th Cir. 1994). “By refusing to make Johnston available, the agency denied the Farmers a “full opportunity” to present relevant facts in violation of 7 C.F.R. §§ 780.3 , 780.9(g). Notwithstanding any specific violation of the appeals regulations, the agency’s refusal to permit the questioning of…”
Doty v. United States, 24 Cl. Ct. 615 (Ct. Cl. 1991). “7 C.F.R. § 780.3 . After an initial appeal determination is made by the county committee, a participant who believes it was improper may obtain review of the county determination by the state committee.”
Elmer T. Wilson, Sr. & Maxine Wilson v. United States Dep't of Agric., 991 F.2d 1211 (5th Cir. 1993). “See 7 C.F.R. § 780.3 — .5 (1989); see generally Raines v.”
Lyle v. Commodity Credit Corp., 898 F. Supp. 808 (D. Kan. 1995). “7 C.F.R. § 780.3 . The CCC administers the Department’s price support programs, making payments to participating farmers through the Agriculture Stabilization and Conservation Service (“ASCS”).”
Frank's Livestock & Poultry Farm, Inc. v. The United States, 905 F.2d 1515 (Fed. Cir. 1990). “7 C.F.R. § 780.3 . If unsuccessful on reconsideration, the participant may then appeal to, and be heard by, the state committee and, if necessary, by the Deputy Administrator, State and County Operations of the Agricultural Stabilization and Conservation Service.”
United States v. Bisson, 646 F. Supp. 701 (D.S.D. 1986). “7 CFR § 780.3 . Should the county committee still rule against forgiveness on reconsideration, then the producer is entitled to appeal to the state ASCS committee.”
Raines v. Block, 599 F. Supp. 196 (D. Colo. 1984). “After learning of this change, plaintiffs requested reconsideration of the administrative determination reducing the payment as provided for in 7 C.F.R. §§ 780.3 and 790. Upon final determination by the ASCS that the dispute would not be resolved in plaintiffs favor, they filed…”
United States v. Batson, 706 F.2d 657 (5th Cir. 1983). “7 C.F.R. §§ 780.3 -.5. A producer was also entitled, to an informal hearing at these two levels of appeal.”
Garvey v. Freeman, 397 F.2d 600 (10th Cir. 1968). “The regulations made no provision for a hearing on the initial determinations based on the Community Committee appraisals but did expressly provide for a reconsideration and informal hearing on any initial determination by the County Committee, 7 C.F.R. 780.3, and an appeal to…”
DCP Farms v. Yeutter, 761 F. Supp. 1269 (N.D. Miss. 1991). “7 C.F.R. § 780.3 . The request for reconsideration begins the ASCS administrative appellate process.”
Garvey v. Freeman, 263 F. Supp. 579 (D. Colo. 1967). “See 7 C.F.R. 780.3, 780-4 and 780.5. At the time of the filing of the complaint, there had been no determination of the “projected farm yield” for plaintiff’s farms.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.