C.F.R. » Title 8 » CHAPTER V—EXECUTIVE OFFICE FOR IMMIGRATION REVIEW, DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE › SUBCHAPTER A—GENERAL PROVISIONS › PART 1003—EXECUTIVE OFFICE FOR IMMIGRATION REVIEW › Subpart C—Immigration Court—Rules of Procedure

8 C.F.R. § 1003.22

Interpreters

Read at: eCFRecfr.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov CasesGoogle Scholar

Any person acting as an interpreter in a hearing shall swear or affirm to interpret and translate accurately, unless the interpreter is an employee of the United States Government, in which event no such oath or affirmation shall be required.

[52 FR 2936, Jan. 29, 1987. Redesignated at 57 FR 11571, Apr. 6, 1992]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 2 cases (1 in the last 5 years), 2006–2025 · leading case: Malaj v. Gonzales, 199 F. App'x 453 (6th Cir. 2006).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Malaj v. Gonzales, 199 F. App'x 453 (6th Cir. 2006). “Malaj argues that the failure to swear in the interpreter in accordance with 8 C.F.R. § 1003.22 amounts to a due process violation.”
Fedorov v. Bondi (9th Cir. 2025). “Because Petitioners do not allege that the interpreter was a non-governmental employee, they cannot establish a due process claim based on a violation of 8 C.F.R. § 1003.22 . See United States 6 24-219, 24-5468 v.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.