8 C.F.R. § 1208.9
[Reserved]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 5
cases, 2008–2012 · leading case: Soumare v. Mukasey, 525 F.3d 547 (7th Cir. 2008).
Soumare v. Mukasey, 525 F.3d 547 (7th Cir. 2008). “In response to the application, an asylum officer interviewed Soumare, see 8 C.F.R. § 1208.9 , and after determining that Soumare was inadmissible, referred his application to the Executive Office of Immigration Review, see id.”
Ndonyi v. Mukasey, 541 F.3d 702 (7th Cir. 2008). “An asylum officer interviewed Ndonyi, see 8 C.F.R. § 1208.9 , and after determining that she was inadmissible, the officer referred Ndonyi’s application to the Executive Office of Immigration Review, see id.”
Dahal v. Holder, 489 F. App'x 470 (1st Cir. 2012). “His lawyer was presumably aware that the immigration judge would expect to review documentary evidence at the initial hearing, see 8 C.F.R. § 1208.9 (e), but even assuming that it was not until the hearing date of December 17, 2008 that he had notice of the need for more…”
Soumare, Oumar v. Mukasey, Michael B. (7th Cir. 2008). “In response to the application, an asylum officer inter- viewed Soumare, see 8 C.F.R. § 1208.9 , and after deter- mining that Soumare was inadmissible, referred his application to the Executive Office of Immigration Review, see id.”
Ndonyi, Pauline v. Holder, Eric H. (7th Cir. 2008). “07-3196 3 An asylum officer interviewed Ndonyi, see 8 C.F.R. § 1208.9 , and after determining that she was inadmissible, the officer referred Ndonyi’s application to the Executive Office of Immigration Review, see id.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.