8 C.F.R. § 208.21

Admission of the asylee's spouse and children

Read at: eCFRecfr.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov CasesGoogle Scholar

(a) Eligibility. In accordance with section 208(b)(3) of the Act, a spouse, as defined in section 101(a)(35) of the Act, 8 U.S.C. 1101(a)(35), or child, as defined in section 101(b)(1) of the Act, also may be granted asylum if accompanying, or following to join, the principal alien who was granted asylum, unless it is determined that the spouse or child is ineligible for asylum under section 208(b)(2)(A)(i), (ii), (iii), (iv) or (v) of the Act for applications filed on or after April 1, 1997, or under § 208.13(c)(2)(i)(A), (C), (D), (E), or (F) for applications filed before April 1, 1997.

(b) Relationship. The relationship of spouse and child as defined in sections 101(a)(35) and 101(b)(1) of the Act must have existed at the time the principal alien's asylum application was approved and must continue to exist at the time of filing for accompanying or following-to-join benefits and at the time of the spouse or child's subsequent admission to the United States. If the asylee proves that the asylee is the parent of a child who was born after asylum was granted, but who was in utero on the date of the asylum grant, the child shall be eligible to accompany or follow-to-join the asylee. The child's mother, if not the principal asylee, shall not be eligible to accompany or follow-to-join the principal asylee unless the child's mother was the principal asylee's spouse on the date the principal asylee was granted asylum.

(c) Spouse or child in the United States. When a spouse or child of an alien granted asylum is in the United States, but was not included in the asylee's benefit request, the asylee may request accompanying or following-to-join benefits for his or her spouse or child, by filing for each qualifying family member a Request for Refugee/Asylee Relative, with supporting evidence, and in accordance with the form instructions, regardless of the status of that spouse or child in the United States. A separate Request for Refugee/Asylee Relative must be filed by the asylee for each qualifying family member within two years of the date in which he or she was granted asylum status, unless it is determined by USCIS that this period should be extended for humanitarian reasons. Upon approval of the Request for Refugee/Asylee Relative, USCIS will notify the asylee of such approval. Employment will be authorized incident to status. To demonstrate employment authorization, USCIS will issue a document reflecting the derivative's current status as an asylee, or the derivative may apply, under 8 CFR 274a.12(a), for employment authorization. The approval of the Request for Refugee/Asylee Relative will remain valid for the duration of the relationship to the asylee and, in the case of a child, while the child is under 21 years of age and unmarried, provided also that the principal's status has not been revoked. However, the approved Request for Refugee/Asylee Relative will cease to confer immigration benefits after it has been used by the beneficiary for admission to the United States as a derivative of an asylee.

(d) Spouse or child outside the United States. When a spouse or child of an alien granted asylum is outside the United States, the asylee may request accompanying or following-to-join benefits for his or her spouse or child(ren) by filing a separate Request for Refugee/Asylee Relative for each qualifying family member in accordance with the form instructions. A separate Request for Refugee/Asylee Relative for each qualifying family member must be filed within two years of the date in which the asylee was granted asylum, unless USCIS determines that the filing period should be extended for humanitarian reasons. When the Request for Refugee/Asylee Relative is approved, USCIS will notify the asylee of such approval. USCIS also will send the approved request to the Department of State for transmission to the U.S. Embassy or Consulate having jurisdiction over the area in which the asylee's spouse or child is located. The approval of the Request for Refugee/Asylee Relative will remain valid for the duration of the relationship to the asylee and, in the case of a child, while the child is under 21 years of age and unmarried, provided also that the principal's status has not been revoked. However, the approved Request for Refugee/Asylee Relative will cease to confer immigration benefits after it has been used by the beneficiary for admission to the United States as a derivative of an asylee.

(e) Denial. If the spouse or child is found to be ineligible for the status accorded under section 208(c) of the Act, a written notice stating the basis for denial shall be forwarded to the principal alien. No appeal shall lie from this decision.

(f) Burden of proof. To establish the claimed relationship of spouse or child as defined in sections 101(a)(35) and 101(b)(1) of the Act, evidence must be submitted with the request as set forth in part 204 of this chapter. Where possible this will consist of the documents specified in § 204.2 (a)(1)(i)(B), (a)(1)(iii)(B), (a)(2), (d)(2), and (d)(5) of this chapter. The burden of proof is on the principal alien to establish by a preponderance of the evidence that any person on whose behalf he or she is making a request under this section is an eligible spouse or child.

(g) Duration. The spouse or child qualifying under section 208(c) of the Act shall be granted asylum for an indefinite period unless the principal's status is revoked.

[62 FR 10337, Mar. 6, 1997, as amended at 63 FR 3796, Jan. 27, 1998. Redesignated at 64 FR 8490, Feb. 19, 1999 and further redesignated and amended at 65 FR 76136, Dec. 6, 2000; 76 FR 53784, Aug. 29, 2011; 76 FR 73476, Nov. 29, 2011]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 47 cases (3 in the last 5 years), 1994–2024 · leading case: Maria Velasquez v. Jefferson Sessions III, 866 F.3d 188 (4th Cir. 2017).
Maria Velasquez v. Jefferson Sessions III, 866 F.3d 188 (4th Cir. 2017). · cites it 2× “§ 1158 (b)(3)(A); 8 C.F.R. § 208.21 . 2 Velasquez’ petition for asylum and withholding of removal was heard by an IJ, who denied the petition on both bases.”
Fatoumata Sira Bah v. Alberto R. Gonzales, 462 F.3d 637 (6th Cir. 2006). · cites it 3× “Should Bah receive asylum, her unmarried daughters, so long as they are younger than 21, 8 C.F.R. § 208.21 (d), "also may be granted asylum if accompanying, or following to join .”
Abrahim Baballah Ula Baballah Ahmad Baballah v. John Ashcroft, Attorney Gen., 367 F.3d 1067 (9th Cir. 2004). “8 C.F.R. § 208.21 (a). Abrahim and Ula Baballah also have two children who are United States citizens.”
Dragan Miljkovic v. John D. Ashcroft, 366 F.3d 580 (7th Cir. 2004). · cites it 3× “8 C.F.R. § 208.21 (c). That would add another layer of paperwork with no benefit to anyone because the government does not suggest that it would have any ground for denying the application.”
Kui Rong Ma v. John Ashcroft, Attorney Gen., 361 F.3d 553 (9th Cir. 2004). “§ 1158 (b)(3); see also 8 C.F.R. § 208.21 (2002). The government’s argument is simply wrong.”
Zahra A. Mohamed Shukri Salah Abdulkadir Salah Hamida Salah Abdi Salah v. John Ashcroft, Attorney Gen. of the United States of Am., 396 F.3d 999 (8th Cir. 2005). “See 8 C.F.R. § 208.21 . Mohamed declined to designate a country of removal, so the IJ designated Somalia, the country of which Mohamed and her children are citizens, pursuant to 8 U.”
Abrahim Baballah Ula Baballah Ahmad Baballah v. John Ashcroft, Attorney Gen., 335 F.3d 981 (9th Cir. 2003). “8 C.F.R. § 208.21 (a). Abrahim and Ula Baballah also have two children who are United States citizens.”
Ranjit John Singh Chand Kumari, A/K/A Chand Kumari Singh Renika Singh v. Immigr. & Naturalization Serv., 94 F.3d 1353 (9th Cir. 1996). “8 C.F.R. § 208.21 (a). 2 . The application was deemed an application for withholding of deportation as well as asylum.”
Martina L. Mungongo v. Alberto R. Gonzales, 479 F.3d 531 (7th Cir. 2007). “Mungongo did not join initially in her husband’s application, see 8 C.F.R. § 208.21 (c). ■ Conclusion The BIA did not abuse its discretion when it denied Ms.”
Ghafoori v. Napolitano, 713 F. Supp. 2d 871 (N.D. Cal. 2010). · cites it 3× “§ 1158 (b)(3); 8 C.F.R. § 208.21 (d). A person must be “unmarried” and “under twenty-one years of age” to satisfy the INA’s definition of “child” and qualify for *874 derivative benefits.”
Huli v. Way, 393 F. Supp. 2d 266 (S.D.N.Y. 2005). · cites it 2× “” 8 C.F.R. § 208.21 . The burden of proving the marriage relationship is on the derivative asylum applicant.”
Udugampola v. Jacobs, 795 F. Supp. 2d 96 (D.D.C. 2011). “A form 1-730 is used by an alien admitted to the United States as a refugee or granted status as an asylee, which once granted, confers follow-to-join benefits on a child, under 21 years of age, or spouse of a person granted asylum pursuant to 8 C.F.R. § 208.21 (c). 4 . A form…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.