8 C.F.R. § 208.31

Reasonable fear of persecution or torture determinations involving aliens ordered removed under section 238(b) of the Act and aliens whose removal is reinstated under section 241(a)(5) of the Act

Read at: eCFRecfr.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov CasesGoogle Scholar

(a) Jurisdiction. This section shall apply to any alien ordered removed under section 238(b) of the Act or whose deportation, exclusion, or removal order is reinstated under section 241(a)(5) of the Act who, in the course of the administrative removal or reinstatement process, expresses a fear of returning to the country of removal. USCIS has exclusive jurisdiction to make reasonable fear determinations, and EOIR has exclusive jurisdiction to review such determinations.

(b) Initiation of reasonable fear determination process. Upon issuance of a Final Administrative Removal Order under § 238.1 of this chapter, or notice under § 241.8(b) of this chapter that an alien is subject to removal, an alien described in paragraph (a) of this section shall be referred to an asylum officer for a reasonable fear determination. In the absence of exceptional circumstances, this determination will be conducted within 10 days of the referral.

(c) Interview and procedure. The asylum officer shall conduct the interview in a non-adversarial manner, separate and apart from the general public. At the time of the interview, the asylum officer shall determine that the alien has an understanding of the reasonable fear determination process. The alien may be represented by counsel or an accredited representative at the interview, at no expense to the Government, and may present evidence, if available, relevant to the possibility of persecution or torture. The alien's representative may present a statement at the end of the interview. The asylum officer, in his or her discretion, may place reasonable limits on the number of persons who may be present at the interview and the length of the statement. If the alien is unable to proceed effectively in English, and if the asylum officer is unable to proceed competently in a language chosen by the alien, the asylum officer shall arrange for the assistance of an interpreter in conducting the interview. The interpreter may not be a representative or employee of the applicant's country or nationality, or if the applicant is stateless, the applicant's country of last habitual residence. The asylum officer shall create a summary of the material facts as stated by the applicant. At the conclusion of the interview, the officer shall review the summary with the alien and provide the alien with an opportunity to correct errors therein. The asylum officer shall create a written record of his or her determination, including a summary of the material facts as stated by the applicant, any additional facts relied on by the officers, and the officer's determination of whether, in light of such facts, the alien has established a reasonable fear of persecution or torture. The alien shall be determined to have a reasonable fear of persecution if the alien establishes a reasonable possibility that he or she would be persecuted on account of his or her race, religion, nationality, membership in a particular social group or political opinion, unless the alien appears to be subject to one or more of the mandatory bars to being granted withholding of removal under the Act contained in section 241(b)(3)(B) of the Act and the alien fails to show that there is a reasonable possibility that no mandatory bar applies, if the asylum officer considers such bars. The alien shall be determined to have a reasonable fear of torture if the alien establishes a reasonable possibility that he or she would be tortured in the country of removal.

(d) Authority. Asylum officers conducting screening determinations under this section shall have the authority described in § 208.9(c).

(e) Referral to Immigration Judge. If an asylum officer determines that an alien described in this section has a reasonable fear of persecution or torture, the officer shall so inform the alien and issue a Form I-863, Notice of Referral to the Immigration Judge, for full consideration of the request for withholding of removal only. Such cases shall be adjudicated by the immigration judge in accordance with the provisions of § 208.16. Appeal of the immigration judge's decision shall lie to the Board of Immigration Appeals.

(f) Removal of aliens with no reasonable fear of persecution or torture. If the asylum officer determines that the alien has not established a reasonable fear of persecution or torture, the asylum officer shall inform the alien in writing of the decision and shall inquire whether the alien wishes to have an immigration judge review the negative decision, using the Record of Negative Reasonable Fear Finding and Request for Review by Immigration Judge, on which the alien must indicate whether he or she desires such review. If the alien refuses to make an indication, DHS shall consider such a response as a decision to decline review.

(g) Review by immigration judge. The asylum officer's negative decision regarding reasonable fear shall be subject to review by an immigration judge upon the alien's request. If the alien requests such review, the asylum officer shall serve him or her with a Notice of Referral to Immigration Judge. The record of determination, including copies of the Notice of Referral to Immigration Judge, the asylum officer's notes, the summary of the material facts, and other materials upon which the determination was based shall be provided to the immigration judge with the negative determination. The immigration judge's review shall proceed under the procedures set forth in 8 CFR 1208.31(g).

[64 FR 8493, Feb. 19, 1999; 64 FR 13881, Mar. 23, 1999; 76 FR 53785, Aug. 29, 2011; 85 FR 80392, Dec. 11, 2020; 89 FR 103413, Dec. 18, 2024]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 250 cases (139 in the last 5 years), 2003–2026 · leading case: Jose Alonso-Juarez v. Merrick Garland
Jose Alonso-Juarez v. Merrick Garland (2023) ca9 · cites it 12× “2021), was unclear on this point, the panel held that the reasonable fear screening regulations, 8 C.F.R. §§ 208.31 and 1208.31, are not inconsistent with the statutory scheme for determining eligibility for withholding of removal.”
Sorto Bonilla v. Attorney General United States (2018) ca3 · cites it 11× “See 8 C.F.R. § 208.31 (a)-(b). Sorto Bonilla met with an asylum officer on four occasions.”
Tomas Bartolome v. Jefferson Sessions, III (2018) ca9 · cites it 6× “These reasonable fear proceedings, as outlined in 8 C.F.R. §§ 208.31 , 1208.31, are intended to provide a fair determination of whether an alien has a reasonable fear of persecution or torture, which fear would require the alien to be referred to an IJ to review eligibility for…”
Nelson Andrade-Garcia v. Loretta E. Lynch (2016) ca9 · cites it 4× “” If the asylum officer concludes that the alien has demonstrated “a reasonable possibility that he or she would be persecuted on account of his or her race, religion, nationality, membership in a particular social group or political opinion, or a reasonable possibility that he…”
Alejandro Ortiz-Alfaro v. Eric Holder, Jr. (2012) ca9 · cites it 11× “OPINION MURGUIA, Circuit Judge: Petitioner Alejandro Ortiz-Alfaro (“Ortiz”) seeks review of 8 C.F.R. § 208.31 , arguing the regulation is unlawful because it precludes him from applying for asylum.”
Johnson v. Guzman Chavez (2021) scotus · cites it 4× “See 8 CFR §§208.31 (a), 1208.31(a). The proceedings that result from such an application are “limited to a determination of whether the alien is eligible for withholding or deferral of removal,” and “all parties are prohibited from raising or considering any other issues,…”
David Castillo Romero v. Attorney General United States (2020) ca3 · cites it 6× “§ 1231 (b)(3)(A))); 8 C.F.R. §§ 208.31 , 241.8(e) (2020). Second, pursuant to Congress’s adoption of the Convention Against Torture in the Foreign Affairs Reform and Restructuring Act of 1998 (“FARRA”), Pub.”
Israel Alvarado-Herrera v. Merrick Garland (2021) ca9 · cites it 5× “8 C.F.R. §§ 208.31 (c), 241.8(e). If the asylum officer determines that the non-citizen has established a reasonable fear, the non- citizen is placed in “withholding only” proceedings before an immigration judge, during which the judge will hold a hearing on whether to grant the…”
Adan Tomas-Ramos v. Merrick Garland (2022) ca4 · cites it 7× “1 When a noncitizen subject to a reinstated removal order expresses fear of 1 Two identical sets of regulations govern the reasonable fear determination process, 8 C.F.R. §§ 208.31 and 1208.31, promulgated by the Department of Homeland Security and the Executive Office for…”
Sonia Calla Mejia v. Jefferson Sessions III (2017) ca4 · cites it 6× “4 Appeal of the IJ’s decision as to the request for withholding of removal lies with the Board of Immigration 4 This regulation was originally promulgated as 8 C.F.R. § 208.31 (e), but was recodified in 2008 at 8 C.”
Eric Hermosillo v. Merrick Garland (2023) ca9 · cites it 8× “8 C.F.R. § 208.31 . When a noncitizen expresses that kind of fear, an asylum officer must perform a screening interview to determine whether the noncitizen’s fear is reasonable.”
Fidel Bibiano v. Loretta E. Lynch (2016) ca9 · cites it 6× “2 See 8 C.F.R. §§ 208.31 , 241.8. The officer concluded that Bibiano “established a reasonable fear of persecution in Mexico” and referred Bibiano’s case to an IJ in Atlanta.”
— 8 C.F.R. § 208.31(b) — 1 case
Cruz-Medina v. Noem (2025) mdd
— 8 C.F.R. § 208.31(c) — 1 case
Navarrete v. Bondi (2026) ca9
— 8 C.F.R. § 208.31(e) — 2 cases
Navarrete v. Bondi (2026) ca9
— 8 C.F.R. § 208.31(f) — 1 case
— 8 C.F.R. § 208.31(g)(1) — 3 cases
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.