C.F.R. » Title 8 » CHAPTER I—DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY › SUBCHAPTER B—IMMIGRATION REGULATIONS › PART 233—CONTRACTS WITH TRANSPORTATION LINES

8 C.F.R. § 233.1

Contracts

Read at: eCFRecfr.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov CasesGoogle Scholar

The contracts with transportation lines referred to in section 233(c) of the Act may be entered into by the Executive Associate Commissioner for Programs, or by an immigration officer designated by the Executive Associate Commissioner for Programs on behalf of the government and shall be documented on Form I-420. The contracts with transportation lines referred to in section 233(a) of the Act shall be made by the Commissioner on behalf of the government and shall be documented on Form I-426. The contracts with transportation lines desiring their passengers to be preinspected at places outside the United States shall be made by the Commissioner on behalf of the government and shall be documented on Form I-425; except that contracts for irregularly operated charter flights may be entered into by the Associate Commissioner for Examinations or an immigration officer designated by the Executive Associate Commissioner for Programs and having jurisdiction over the location where the inspection will take place.

[62 FR 10353, Mar. 6, 1997]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 3 cases, 1981–1994 · leading case: Alphonse, 18 I. & N. Dec. 178 (BIA 1981).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Alphonse, 18 I. & N. Dec. 178 (BIA 1981). · cites it 2× “The place of detention is deter- mined by the immigration officer at the port of entry pursuant to 8 C.F.R. 233.1. Sec generally - lA Gordon and Rosenfield, Immigration Law and Procedure, section 3.”
Dia Navigation Co. v. Pomeroy, 34 F.3d 1255 (3rd Cir. 1994). “See 8 C.F.R. §§ 233.1 , 235.3 (1986). In imposing this requirement, INS relied on the provisions of 8 U.”
Dia Navigation Co., Ltd v. Pomeroy (3rd Cir. 1994). “See 8 C.F.R. §§ 233.1 , 235.3 (1986). In imposing this requirement, INS relied on the provisions of 8 U.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.