8 C.F.R. § 235.9

Northern Marianas identification card

Read at: eCFRecfr.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov CasesGoogle Scholar

During the two-year period that ended July 1, 1990, the Service issued Northern Marianas Identification Cards to aliens who acquired United States citizenship when the Covenant to Establish a Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands in Political Union with the United States entered into force on November 3, 1986. These cards remain valid as evidence of United States citizenship. Although the Service no longer issues these cards, a United States citizen to whom a card was issued may file Form I-777, Application for Issuance or Replacement of Northern Marianas Card, to obtain replacement of a lost, stolen, or mutilated Northern Marianas Identification Card.

[62 FR 10359, Mar. 6, 1997]

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 12 cases, 1966–1993 · leading case: Cheng Ho Mui & Pun Yi Pan v. Dominick Rinaldi, as Dist. Dir. of the Immigr. & Naturalization Serv. of New Jersey, 408 F.2d 28 (3rd Cir. 1969).

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

Cheng Ho Mui & Pun Yi Pan v. Dominick Rinaldi, as Dist. Dir. of the Immigr. & Naturalization Serv. of New Jersey, 408 F.2d 28 (3rd Cir. 1969). · cites it 3× “Pursuant to the statutory directive, the Attorney General has promulgated regulations to administer these provisions, one of which, 8 C.F.R. § 235.9 , establishes immigration service officers to process refugee applications in the following *29 countries: Austria, Belgium,…”

Chan Hing v. Esperdy, 262 F. Supp. 973 (S.D.N.Y. 1966). · cites it 5× “ective applications under Section 203(a) (7) were to be approved, it would still be necessary for the plaintiffs to leave the United States; and, third, that insofar as plaintiffs sought to apply for classification as refugees under Section 203(a) (7) and thus to qualify for…”

Tai Mui v. Esperdy, 371 F.2d 772 (2d Cir. 1966). · cites it 3× “Those pertinent to conditional entry are 8 C.F.R. § 235.9 (a) and (c), 31 F.R. 5118 (1966): “§ 235.”

Dhine v. Dist. Dir., 818 F. Supp. 671 (S.D.N.Y. 1993). “See also 8 C.F.R. 235.9(a). Dhine does not contend that he was ever inspected and deemed admissible pursuant to this section; he concedes that he never presented himself and demanded to be inspected for admissibility.”

Chavarri-alva, 14 I. & N. Dec. 298 (BIA 1973). “" We need not pause to consider whether respondent, while in the United States, is eligible to apply for section 202(aX7) conditional entry under 8 CFR 235.9 or whether, as a Western Hemisphere native, he is eligible for adjustment under the proviso to section 203(a)(7) in view…”

Peter Chow Lung Shen v. P. A. Esperdy, as Dist. Dir. of the Immigr. & Naturalization Serv., 428 F.2d 293 (2d Cir. 1970). “8 C.F.R. § 235.9 (1970). Given this regulation, the broadest scope which the “not a national” language can be afforded is that it merely states that applicants for conditional entries cannot be nationals of one of these seven nations within which they have applied.”

Luen Kwan Fu v. Immigr. & Naturalization Serv., 431 F.2d 73 (2d Cir. 1970). “Esperdy, supra at 779-781, that the regulation designating *77 countries where applications for “conditional entry” may be brought and processed, 8 C.F.R. § 235.9 (a) is arbitrary, and therefore invalid, because it fails to provide an office in any country in the Orient where…”

Tai Mui v. P. A. Esperdy, as Dist. Dir. of the Immigr. & Naturalizationservice for the Dist. of New York, Chan Hing & Lai Cho v. P. A. Esperdy, as Dist. Dir. of the Immigr. & Naturalizationservice for the Dist. of New York, Woo Cheng Hwa v. Immigr. & Naturalization Serv., 371 F.2d 772 (2d Cir. 1966). · cites it 3× “27 As indicated, Chan Hing's and Lai Cho's position is that the regulations dealing with conditional entries, 8 C.F.R. 235.9, are invalid for failure to list the United States as a non-Communist or non-Communist-dominated country where an alien may apply, be examined, and be…”

Wong Pak Yan v. Rinaldi, 429 F.2d 151 (3rd Cir. 1970). “9 of the Immigration Regulations, prescribed by the Commissioner of Immigration and Naturalization under the Act, 8 CFR § 235.9 , provides that.the countries in which applications for conditional entry under section 203(a) (7) may be made to officers of the Service are Austria,…”

Wong Pak Yan v. Dominick Rinaldi, as Dist. Dir. of the Immigr. & Naturalizationservice of New Jersey. Wu Chun Hin v. Dominick Rinaldi, as Dist. Dir. of the Immigr. & Naturalizationservice of New Jersey, 429 F.2d 151 (3rd Cir. 1970). “9 of the Immigration Regulations, prescribed by the Commissioner of Immigration and Naturalization under the Act, 8 CFR 235.9, provides that the countries in which applications for conditional entry under section 203(a)(7) may be made to officers of the Service are Austria,…”

Kotur, 12 I. & N. Dec. 609 (BIA 1967). “It therefore appears that under the provisions of section 203 (g) and (h) of the Act and the regulations contained in 8 CFR 235.9 the visa petition is premature inasmuch as two years have not elapsed since the petitioner's conditional entry into the United States and he has not…”

Chau, 11 I. & N. Dec. 746 (BIA 1966). “His application as a refugee must be made outside the United States (8 CFR 235.9). Under 8 CFR 245.4 adjustment of status under the proviso to section 203(a) (7) of the Immigration and Nationality Act is gov- erned by section 245 of that Act and the regulations promulgated…”

— 8 C.F.R. § 235.9(a) — 2 cases

Tai Mui v. P. A. Esperdy, as Dist. Dir. of the Immigr. & Naturalizationservice for the Dist. of New York, Chan Hing & Lai Cho v. P. A. Esperdy, as Dist. Dir. of the Immigr. & Naturalizationservice for the Dist. of New York, Woo Cheng Hwa v. Immigr. & Naturalization Serv., 371 F.2d 772 (2d Cir. 1966). “27 As indicated, Chan Hing's and Lai Cho's position is that the regulations dealing with conditional entries, 8 C.F.R. 235.9, are invalid for failure to list the United States as a non-Communist or non-Communist-dominated country where an alien may apply, be examined, and be…”

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.