8 C.F.R. § 236.21

Applicability

Read at: eCFRecfr.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov CasesGoogle Scholar

(a) This subpart applies to requests for deferred action under the enforcement discretion policy set forth in this subpart, which will be described as Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA). This subpart does not apply to or govern any other request for or grant of deferred action or any other DHS deferred action policy.

(b) Except as specifically provided in this subpart, the provisions of 8 CFR part 103 do not apply to requests filed under this subpart.

(c)(1) Deferred action is an exercise of the Secretary's broad authority to establish national immigration enforcement policies and priorities under 6 U.S.C. 202(5) and section 103 of the Act. It is a form of enforcement discretion not to pursue the removal of certain aliens for a limited period in the interest of ordering enforcement priorities in light of limitations on available resources, taking into account humanitarian considerations and administrative convenience. It furthers the administrability of the complex immigration system by permitting the Secretary to focus enforcement on higher priority targets. This temporary forbearance from removal does not confer any right or entitlement to remain in or reenter the United States. A grant of deferred action under this section does not preclude DHS from commencing removal proceedings at any time or prohibit DHS or any other Federal agency from initiating any criminal or other enforcement action at any time.

(2) During this period of forbearance, on the basis of this subpart only, USCIS may grant employment authorization pursuant to 8 CFR 274a.13 and 274a.12(c)(33) to DACA recipients who have demonstrated an economic need.

(3) During this period of forbearance, on the basis of this subpart only, a DACA recipient is considered “lawfully present” under the provisions of 8 CFR 1.3(a)(4)(vi).

(4) During this period of forbearance, on the basis of this subpart only, a DACA recipient is not considered “unlawfully present” for the purpose of inadmissibility under section 212(a)(9) of the Act.

(d) This subpart rescinds and replaces the DACA guidance set forth in the Memorandum issued by the Secretary of Homeland Security on June 15, 2012. All current grants of deferred action and any ancillary features previously issued pursuant to the Memorandum remain in effect and will expire according to their existing terms. All such current grants of deferred action and any ancillary features, as well as any requests for renewals of those grants and new requests, are hereafter governed by this subpart and not the Memorandum.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 8 cases (8 in the last 5 years), 2023–2026 · leading case: Dep't of State v. Munoz, 602 U.S. 899 (2024).
Dep't of State v. Munoz, 602 U.S. 899 (2024). “Even though DACA status entitles them to work and live in the country without the immediate threat of re- moval, see 8 CFR § 236.21 (c) (2023), it does not change their initial entry designation.”
Aldo De Leon Resendiz v. Exxon Mobil Corp., 72 F.4th 623 (4th Cir. 2023). “(June 15, 2012); see also 8 C.F.R. § 236.21 (c)(1) (DACA “is a form of enforcement discretion not to pursue the removal of certain aliens for a limited period in the interest of ordering enforcement priorities in light of limitations on available resources, taking into account…”
Dep't of State v. Munoz, 602 U.S. 899 (2024). “Even though DACA status entitles them to work and live in the country without the immediate threat of removal, see 8 CFR §236.21 (c), it does not change their initial entry designation.”
Gaspar v. Mayorkas (S.D. Cal. 2023). · cites it 2× “” 8 C.F.R. § 236.21 (c)(1). “A grant of deferred action under 11 this section does not preclude DHS from commencing removal proceedings at any time 12 or prohibit DHS or any other Federal agency from initiating any criminal or other 13 enforcement action at any time.”
Intriago-Sedgwick (D.N.M. 2025). · cites it 2× “” 8 C.F.R. § 236.21 (c). DACA status is not permanent but rather is subject to renewal every two years.”
Dep't of State v. Munoz Revisions: 6/21/24, 602 U.S. 899 (2024). “Even though DACA status entitles them to work and live in the country without the immediate threat of removal, see 8 CFR §236.21 (c), it does not change their initial entry designation.”
Noem (W.D. La. 2026). “Perry, 2026 WL 131917 , at *7–*8 (E.D. Va. Jan. 19, 2026); A.C.R. v. Noem, __ F.”
Ismael Perez v. Assistant Field Off. Dir., Krome North Serv. Processing Ctr. (11th Cir. 2026). “8 C.F.R. § 236.21 (c)(1). USCA11 Case: 25-14065 Document: 74-1 Date Filed: 05/06/2026 Page: 23 of 110 25-14065 Opinion of the Court 23 down the branching pathways of classifications of present aliens into the single divergent status of admitted or not.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.