8 C.F.R. § 236.24

Severability

Read at: eCFRecfr.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov CasesGoogle Scholar

(a) Any provision of this subpart held to be invalid or unenforceable as applied to any person or circumstance shall be construed so as to continue to give the maximum effect to the provision permitted by law, including as applied to persons not similarly situated or to dissimilar circumstances, unless such holding is that the provision of this subpart is invalid and unenforceable in all circumstances, in which event the provision shall be severable from the remainder of this subpart and shall not affect the remainder thereof.

(b) The provisions in § 236.21(c)(2) through (4) and § 274a.12(c)(14) and 274a.12(c)(33) are intended to be severable from one another, from this subpart and any grant of forbearance from removal resulting from this subpart, and from any provision referenced in those paragraphs, including such referenced provision's application to persons with deferred action generally.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 2 cases (2 in the last 5 years), 2023–2025 · leading case: State of Texas v. United States, 126 F.4th 392 (5th Cir. 2025).
State of Texas v. United States, 126 F.4th 392 (5th Cir. 2025). · cites it 2× “53 ,248–49; 8 CFR § 236.24 (a) & (b). 6 The states are Texas, Alabama, Arkansas, Louisiana, Nebraska, South Carolina, West Virginia, Kansas, Mississippi, and Maine.”
State of Texas v. United States of Am. (S.D. Tex. 2023). · cites it 2× “8 C.F.R. § 236.24 . 7 Given the relatively small number of APA cases brought in the Fifth Circuit, the case law concerning severability of an APA rule is scant.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.