An eligible alien, as defined in § 245a.10, may adjust status to LPR status under LIFE Legalization if:
(a) He or she properly files, with fee, Form I-485, Application to Register Permanent Residence or Adjust Status, with the Service during the application period beginning June 1, 2001, and ending June 4, 2003.
(b) He or she entered the United States before January 1, 1982, and resided continuously in the United States in an unlawful status since that date through May 4, 1988;
(c) He or she was continuously physically present in the United States during the period beginning on November 6, 1986, and ending on May 4, 1988;
(d) He or she is not inadmissible to the United States for permanent residence under any provisions of section 212(a) of the Act, except as provided in § 245a.18, and that he or she:
(1) Has not been convicted of any felony or of three or more misdemeanors committed in the United States;
(2) Has not assisted in the persecution of any person or persons on account of race, religion, nationality, membership in a particular social group, or political opinion; and
(3) Is registered or registering under the Military Selective Service Act, if the alien is required to be so registered; and
(e) He or she can demonstrate basic citizenship skills.
[66 FR 29673, June 1, 2001, as amended at 67 FR 38350, June 4, 2002]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in
5
cases, 2007–2016 · leading case:
Rehman v. Lynch, 660 F. App'x 52 (2d Cir. 2016).
Rehman v. Lynch, 660 F. App'x 52 (2d Cir. 2016).
· cites it 2× “See 8 C.F.R. §§ 245a.11 (requirements), 245a.”
Habib Khan v. Eric Holder, Jr., 542 F. App'x 627 (9th Cir. 2013).
“8 C.F.R. § 245a.11. The AAO found Khan’s evidence of continuous residence failed to meet his “more likely than not” burden.”
Canales v. Holder, 315 F. App'x 613 (9th Cir. 2009).
“2003); 8 C.F.R. § 245a.11. To the extent petitioners challenge the BIA’s May 2, 2006 order dismissing their appeal, we lack jurisdiction because they did not timely petition for review of that order.”
Canales v. Holder, 315 F. App'x 613 (9th Cir. 2009).
“2003); 8 C.F.R. § 245a.11. To the extent petitioners challenge the BIA’s May 2, 2006 order dismissing their appeal, we lack jurisdiction because they did not timely petition for review of that order.”
Villar v. Bd. of Immigr. Appeals, 222 F. App'x 27 (2d Cir. 2007).
“See 8 C.F.R. § 245a.11. In this case, the IJ reasonably denied Villar’s motion for a continuance pending the resolution of his application for adjustment of status under the LIFE Act, because Villar was ineligible for adjustment under this Act, as he had previously been…”
— 8 C.F.R. § 245a.11(b) — 1 case
Rehman v. Lynch, 660 F. App'x 52 (2d Cir. 2016).
“See 8 C.F.R. §§ 245a.11 (requirements), 245a.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.