8 C.F.R. § 265.1
Reporting change of address
Except for those exempted by section 263(b) of the Act, all aliens in the United States required to register under section 262 of the Act must report each change of address and new address within 10 days of such change in accordance with instructions provided by USCIS.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 13
cases, 1989–2020 · leading case: Carissa Ann Marie Dominguez v. U.S. Attorney Gen.
Carissa Ann Marie Dominguez v. U.S. Attorney Gen. (2002)
“See also 8 C.F.R. § 265.1 . 3 Failing to provide the INS with a change of address will preclude the alien from claiming that the INS did not provide him or her with notice of a hearing.”
Pasqual Antonio-Martinez v. Immigration and Naturalization Service (2003)
“§ 1305 (a); 8 C.F.R. § 265.1 . 2 He failed to do so, and his counsel and the INS are now unable to locate him because of his dereliction.”
Mohammad v. Slattery (1994)
“On December 3, *1556 1990, the BIA, citing 8 C.F.R. § 265.1 , 4 dismissed the appeal on the grounds that petitioner had failed to provide notice of his address change within ten days after his move, and that this precluded any showing of reasonable cause for his absence from the…”
Al-Rawahneh v. Immigration & Naturalization Service (2002)
“8 C.F.R. § 265.1 (1991). The record establishes that all requirements for the service of notices to the respondents have been met.”
Nidia Del Rosario URBINA-OSEJO, Petitioner, v. IMMIGRATION AND NATURALIZATION SERVICE, Respondent (1997)
“See also 8 C.F.R. § 265.1 (same). There are no exceptions in the statute or regulations.”
Ayuda, Inc. v. Richard Thornburgh (1989)
“; see 8 C.F.R. § 265.1 (1981). Any alien failing to comply with this reporting requirement was subject to deportation unless he could show that such failure was “reasonably excusable or was not willful.”
Martin v. Mukasey (2008)
“§ 1305 (a); 8 C.F.R. § 265.1 . Subpoenaed utility records indicated an address for Mr.”
Ayuda, Inc. v. Richard Thornburgh, Individually, and as Attorney General of the United States, (Two Cases) Ayuda, Inc. v (1991)
“§ 1305 (1982); see also 8 C.F.R. § 265.1 (1981). . The Court also believed that a “collateral challenges" exception to the statutory review limitations was indicated by the “abuse of discretion” standard of judicial review under section 1160(e)(3)(B), which, although…”
Manijeh Khalaj v. James Cole, District Director, Immigration and Naturalization Service (1995)
“See 8 C.F.R. § 265.1 . 3 . In an Affidavit in Support of Request for Asylum dated December 4, 1990, Khalaj stated that her sister Farzaneh had applied for asylum in Germany, and her other sister, Nadia, hoped to go to Germany.”
Lefsih v. Wolf (2020)
“§ 1305 (a); 8 C.F.R. § 265.1 . Such argument is unpersuasive for several reasons.”
Victor Tyrone Belle v. U.S. Attorney General (2008)
“8 C.F.R. § 265.1 . The regulations also require the alien to provide written notice of a change of address on Form EOIR-33 to the Immigration Court where the charging document has been filed.”
Lopez, Brigida v. Gonzales, Alberto (2006)
“§ 1305 (a); 8 C.F.R. § 265.1 (requiring alien to keep address current by completing and mailing Form AR-11 to Department of Justice).”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.