8 C.F.R. § 292.1

Representation of others

Read at: eCFRecfr.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov CasesGoogle Scholar

(a) A person entitled to representation may be represented by any of the following, subject to the limitations in 8 CFR 103.2(a)(3):

(1) Attorneys in the United States. Any attorney as defined in8 CFR 1.2.

(2) Law students and law graduates not yet admitted to the bar. A law student who is enrolled in an accredited U.S. law school, or a graduate of an accredited U.S. law school who is not yet admitted to the bar, provided that:

(i) He or she is appearing at the request of the person entitled to representation;

(ii) In the case of a law student, he or she has filed a statement that he or she is participating, under the direct supervision of a faculty member, licensed attorney, or accredited representative, in a legal aid program or clinic conducted by a law school or non-profit organization, and that he or she is appearing without direct or indirect remuneration from the alien he or she represents;

(iii) In the case of a law graduate, he or she has filed a statement that he or she is appearing under the supervision of a licensed attorney or accredited representative and that he or she is appearing without direct or indirect remuneration from the alien he or she represents; and

(iv) The law student's or law graduate's appearance is permitted by the DHS official before whom he or she wishes to appear. The DHS official may require that a law student be accompanied by the supervising faculty member, attorney, or accredited representative.

(3) Reputable individuals. Any reputable individual of good moral character, provided that:

(i) He is appearing on an individual case basis, at the request of the person entitled to representation;

(ii) He is appearing without direct or indirect renumeration and files a written declaration to that effect;

(iii) He has a pre-existing relationship or connection with the person entitled to representation (e.g., as a relative, neighbor, clergyman, business associate or personal friend), provided that such requirement may be waived, as a matter of administrative discretion, in cases where adequate representation would not otherwise be available; and

(iv) His or her appearance is permitted by the DHS official before whom he or she seeks to appear, provided that such permission will not be granted with respect to any individual who regularly engages in immigration and naturalization practice or preparation, or holds himself or herself out to the public as qualified to do so.

(4) Accredited representatives. A person representing an organization described in § 292.2 of this chapter who has been accredited by the Board.

(5) Accredited officials. An accredited official, in the United States, of the government to which an alien owes allegiance, if the official appears solely in his official capacity and with the alien's consent.

(6) Attorneys outside the United States. An attorney, other than one described in 8 CFR 1.2, who is licensed to practice law and is in good standing in a court of general jurisdiction of the country in which he or she resides and who is engaged in such practice, may represent parties in matters before DHS, provided that he or she represents persons only in matters outside the geographical confines of the United States as defined in section 101(a)(38) of the Act, and that the DHS official before whom he or she wishes to appear allows such representation as a matter of discretion.

(b) Persons formerly authorized to practice. A person, other than a representative of an organization described in § 292.2 of this chapter, who on December 23, 1952, was authorized to practice before the Board and the Service may continue to act as a representative, subject to the provisions of § 292.3 of this chapter.

(c) Former employees. No person previously employed by the Department of Justice shall be permitted to act as a representative in any case in violation of the provisions of 28 CFR 45.735-7.

(d) Amicus curiae. The Board may grant permission to appear, on a case-by-case basis, as amicus curiae, to an attorney or to an organization represented by an attorney, if the public interest will be served thereby.

(e) Except as set forth in this section, no other person or persons shall represent others in any case.

[40 FR 23271, May 29, 1975, as amended at 53 FR 7728, Mar. 10, 1988; 55 FR 49251, Nov. 27, 1990; 61 FR 53610, Oct. 15, 1996; 62 FR 23635, May 1, 1997; 75 FR 5227, Feb. 2, 2010; 76 FR 53797, Aug. 29, 2011]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 42 cases, 1962–2019 · leading case: Maria Ramirez v. Immigr. & Naturalization Serv., 550 F.2d 560 (9th Cir. 1977).
Maria Ramirez v. Immigr. & Naturalization Serv., 550 F.2d 560 (9th Cir. 1977). · cites it 8× “The rules prescribing who may represent another in deportation proceedings are presently covered by 8 C.F.R. § 292.1 (amended 1975). 1 Under these rules representation may be by an attorney or, subject *563 to certain restrictions, a law student, a law graduate, or a “reputable…”
In Re: Queen's Univ. at Kingston, 820 F.3d 1287 (Fed. Cir. 2016). · cites it 4× “For example, under 8 C.F.R. § 292.1 , certain categories of non-lawyers are authorized to repre- sent others in immigration proceedings.”
Canaveral Toban v. Ashcroft, 385 F.3d 40 (1st Cir. 2004). · cites it 4× “8 C.F.R. § 292.1 . However, "Tony” was probably ineligible to represent Canaveral in this situation because he does not appear to have been a law student, 8 C.”
Mooneer Riad Tawadrus v. John Ashcroft, Attorney Gen., 364 F.3d 1099 (9th Cir. 2004). “§ 1362 ; the regulations enforcing this right can be found at 8 C.F.R. § 292.1 -.6, and in the Rules of Procedure for Immigration Courts, 8 C.”
Julio Donaldo Ponce-Leiva v. John D. Ashcroft, Attorney Gen. of the United States, 331 F.3d 369 (3rd Cir. 2003). “8 C.F.R. §§ 292.1 , 292.5. At any rate, the distinction between "rights” and "privileges” has been long discredited.”
Rajah v. Mukasey, 544 F.3d 427 (2d Cir. 2008). “See 8 C.F.R. 292.1(a). E) Coercion: 8 C.F.R. § 287.”
Maurice Lavira v. Attorney Gen. of the United States, 478 F.3d 158 (3rd Cir. 2007). “Thereafter venue was changed to the York Immigration Court in Pennsylvania, and Lavira received free counsel pursuant *161 to 8 C.F.R. § 292.1 (a)(2). He applied for withholding of removal to Haiti under 8 U.”
State Ex Rel. Indiana State Bar Ass'n v. Diaz, 838 N.E.2d 433 (Ind. 2005). · cites it 2× “See 8 C.F.R. § 292.1 (2005). To qualify to practice as an "accredited representative," an individual must first be affiliated with an organization recognized by the BIA as a "non-profit religious, charitable, social service, or similar organization" that charges individuals only…”
Maria Corado Rodriguez, & Juan Carlos Corado Moreno v. Immigr. & Naturalization Serv., 841 F.2d 865 (9th Cir. 1988). “Explanation of Failure to Seek Asylum or Withholding of Deportation Before the IJ The Corados contend that they explained the facts set forth in their affidavit in support of their motion to remand to their representative at the deportation hearing, Ms. Margie Sapiens of the…”
Eliseo Cayabyab Beltran v. United States Immigr. & Naturalization Serv., 332 F.3d 407 (6th Cir. 2003). · cites it 2× “8 C.F.R. § 292.1 (a)(2)(iii). The official before whom the law graduate is appearing- — -here, the Immigration Judge— must give his permission for the law graduate to represent the alien.”
Velasquez, 19 I. & N. Dec. 377 (BIA 1986). “See 8 C.F.R. §§ 292.1 , 292.4, 292.5(a) (1986).”
United States v. Luna, 436 F.3d 312 (1st Cir. 2006). “See 8 C.F.R. §§ 292.1 , 292.2. 7 . Under the statute, a defendant may challenge the validity of a deportation order that serves as the basis for an indictment for illegal reentry.”
— 8 C.F.R. § 292.1(a) — 1 case
Rajah v. Mukasey, 544 F.3d 427 (2d Cir. 2008). “See 8 C.F.R. 292.1(a). E) Coercion: 8 C.F.R. § 287.”
— 8 C.F.R. § 292.1(a)(4) — 1 case
Koden, 15 I. & N. Dec. 739 (BIA 1976).
— 8 C.F.R. § 292.1(b) — 1 case
Guerra & Sanchez, 15 I. & N. Dec. 251 (BIA 1975).
— 8 C.F.R. § 292.1(c) — 1 case
Guerra & Sanchez, 15 I. & N. Dec. 251 (BIA 1975).
— 8 C.F.R. § 292.1(d) — 2 cases
Elly Velez Pamatong, 17 I. & N. Dec. 175 (BIA 1979).
Dejong, 16 I. & N. Dec. 739 (BIA 1979).
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.