8 C.F.R. § 3.0
Executive Office for Immigration Review
Regulations of the Executive Office for Immigration Review relating to the adjudication of immigration matters before immigration judges (referred to in some regulations as special inquiry officers) and the Board of Immigration Appeals are located in 8 CFR chapter V, part 1003.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 33
cases (4 in the last 5 years), 1987–2024 · leading case: Sead Pilica v. John Ashcroft, 388 F.3d 941 (6th Cir. 2004).
Sead Pilica v. John Ashcroft, 388 F.3d 941 (6th Cir. 2004). “8 C.F.R. § 3.0 (2004). Thus, for example, 8 C.”
Burbano, 20 I. & N. Dec. 872 (BIA 1994). “See 8 C.F.R. §§ 3.0 , 100.2 (1994). The Board has been independent of the service since June 1940 when immigration responsibilities were transferred from the Secretary of Labor to the Attorney General.”
Mohammad Zafar Tipu v. Immigr. & Naturalization Serv., 20 F.3d 580 (3rd Cir. 1994). “Whereas the BIA's opinion stated that the petitioner owned no property in this country, the majority finds that the record establishes that as of 1986 the petitioner owned a taxicab that he had purchased two years earlier for $1700.”
Rigoberto Yepes-Prado v. U.S. Immigr. & Naturalization Serv., 10 F.3d 1363 (9th Cir. 1993). “8 C.F.R. §§ 3.0 , 3.1(a)(1) & (d)(1) (1993).”
Jose Manuel Goncalves v. Immigr. & Naturalization Serv., 6 F.3d 830 (1st Cir. 1993). “§ 1103 (a); 8 C.F.R. §§ 3.0 , 3.1(a), (b)(3), 212.3(a)(2), (e)(3) (1993)) to exercise a kind of equitable discretion that would permit them to remain here even though they have, for example, committed a drug crime.”
Carlos A. Mejia Galindo v. Jefferson B. Sessions III, 897 F.3d 894 (7th Cir. 2018). “3d at 976 ; 8 C.F.R. § 3.0 . Second, the removal order becomes "final" upon "a determination by the Board of Immigration Appeals affirming such order" or upon expiration of the period for the alien to seek review.”
Giraldo v. Holder, 654 F.3d 609 (6th Cir. 2011). “” 8 C.F.R. § 3.0 (noting that "immigration judges” are "referred to in some regulations as special inquiry officers”).”
Carmen Miranda De Gonzalez v. Immigr. & Naturalization Serv., 996 F.2d 804 (6th Cir. 1993). “8 C.F.R. § 3.0 (a)(1) Organization. There shall be in the Department of Justice a Board of Immigration Appeals, subject to the general supervision of the Director, Executive Office for Immigration Review.”
Patricio Hernandez-Cordero & Maria Guadalupe Ortega De Hernandez v. United States Immigr. & Naturalization Serv., 819 F.2d 558 (5th Cir. 1987). “8 C.F.R. §§ 3.0 , 3.1. In the instant case, Mr.”
Ponce De Leon, 21 I. & N. Dec. 154 (BIA 1996). “§§ 1103 (a), 1226(a), 1252(b) (1994); 8 C.F.R. § 3.0 (1995); 28 C.F.R. Part 24 (1995); Matter of Anselmo, supra, at 30; Matter of Torres, 19 I&N Dec.”
Jimenez, 21 I. & N. Dec. 567 (BIA 1996). “As we explained in Matter of Esposito, supra, at 7, “the relief provided by section 212(c) is the waiver of a particular ground of exclusion or deporta- tion, not a waiver of the particular offense which forms the basis for that ground of exclusion or deportation.”
United States v. Aguirre-Tello, 324 F.3d 1181 (10th Cir. 2003). “See 8 C.F.R. §§ 3.0 , 3.1(a)(1), (b)(3) & (d)(1) (1993); see also Yepes-Prado v.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.