8 C.F.R. § 318.1
Warrant of arrest
For the purposes of section 318 of the Act, a notice to appear issued under 8 CFR part 239 (including a charging document issued to commence proceedings under sections 236 or 242 of the Act prior to April 1, 1997) shall be regarded as a warrant of arrest.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 17
cases (4 in the last 5 years), 1991–2025 · leading case: Seanlim Yith v. Kirstjen Nielsen, 881 F.3d 1155 (9th Cir. 2018).
Seanlim Yith v. Kirstjen Nielsen, 881 F.3d 1155 (9th Cir. 2018). “” 8 C.F.R. § 318.1 . Because the DHS issued notices to appear to the Yiths, the government contends, “a removal proceeding pursuant to a warrant of arrest” was pending against them, for purposes of § 1429.”
Acosta Hidalgo, 24 I. & N. Dec. 103 (BIA 2007). “” See 8 C.F.R. § 318.1 (2006) (stating that a notice to appear shall be regarded as a warrant of arrest).”
Trinidad Klene v. Janet Napolitano, 697 F.3d 666 (7th Cir. 2012). “8 C.F.R. § 318.1 . An agency can’t rewrite statutory terms, but it can define its own vocabulary.”
Robertson-Dewar v. Mukasey, 599 F. Supp. 2d 772 (W.D. Tex. 2009). “§ 1429 ; see 8 C.F.R. § 318.1 (notice to appear considered warrant of arrest).”
Kestelboym v. Chertoff, 538 F. Supp. 2d 813 (D.N.J. 2008). “8 C.F.R. § 318.1 (1997). 6 .“A person whose application for naturalization under this title is denied, after a hearing before an immigration officer under section 1447(a) of this Title, may seek review of such denial before the United States district court for the district in…”
Apokarina v. Ashcroft, 232 F. Supp. 2d 414 (E.D. Pa. 2002). “8 C.F.R. § 318.1 4 . Section 1429 provided, in pertinent part: no person shall be naturalized against whom there is outstanding a final finding of deportability pursuant to a warrant of arrest .”
Apokarina v. Atty Gen USA, 93 F. App'x 469 (3rd Cir. 2004). “No argument or briefing was presented to us on the question whether, during the period between the time that removal proceedings are administratively closed and the time that those proceedings are reopened, they are properly deemed pending.”
Ngwana v. Attorney Gen. of US, 40 F. Supp. 2d 319 (D. Maryland 1999). “…U.S.C. § 1421 (c). 1 . An order lo show cause issued in a deportation proceeding is regarded as a warrant of arrest. 8 C.F.R. § 318.1”
Grewal v. Ashcroft, 301 F. Supp. 2d 692 (N.D. Ohio 2004). “8 C.F.R. § 318.1 . 6 . This “race” occurred because of the interrelationship between naturalization and deportation proceedings.”
Mendonca v. Immigr. & Naturalization Serv., 52 F. Supp. 2d 155 (D. Mass. 1999). “is regarded as a ‘warrant of arrest’” for purposes of § 1429 (citing cases and 8 C.F.R. § 318.1 (1990))). ORDER The government’s motion to dismiss (Docket No.”
Mosleh v. Strapp, 992 F. Supp. 874 (N.D. Tex. 1998). “See 8 C.F.R. § 318.1 (1990); see also, Shomberg v.”
United States v. Ali, 757 F. Supp. 710 (W.D. Va. 1991). “” See 8 C.F.R. § 318.1 (1990); see also Shomberg v.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.