8 C.F.R. § 335.6

Failure to appear for examination

Read at: eCFRecfr.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov CasesGoogle Scholar

(a) An applicant for naturalization shall be deemed to have abandoned his or her application if he or she fails to appear for the examination pursuant to § 335.3 and fails to notify USCIS of the reason for non-appearance within 30 days of the scheduled examination. Such notification shall be in writing and contain a request for rescheduling of the examination. In the absence of a timely notification, USCIS may administratively close the application without making a decision on the merits.

(b) An applicant may reopen an administratively closed application by submitting a written request to USCIS within one (1) year from the date the application was closed. Such reopening shall be without additional fee. The date of the request for reopening shall be the date of filing of the application for purposes of determining eligibility for naturalization.

(c) If the applicant does not request reopening of an administratively closed application within one year from the date the application was closed, USCIS will consider that application to have been abandoned, and shall dismiss the application without further notice to the applicant.

[58 FR 49914, Sept. 24, 1993, as amended at 60 FR 6651, Feb. 3, 1995; 76 FR 53801, Aug. 29, 2011]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 2 cases, 2007–2007 · leading case: Issa v. Mueller, 486 F. Supp. 2d 668 (E.D. Mich. 2007).
Issa v. Mueller, 486 F. Supp. 2d 668 (E.D. Mich. 2007). “”); 8 C.F.R. § 335.6 (a) (“An applicant for naturalization shall be deemed to have abandoned his or her application if he or she fails to appear for the examination”); 8 C.”
Abuhadba v. Gonzales, 512 F. Supp. 2d 1347 (N.D. Ga. 2007). “” ( 8 C.F.R. § 335.6 .) An applicant cannot appear in front of a CIS officer throughout the lengthy investigation process, and the reference to a “scheduled” examination further suggests a distinction between an “examination” and an “investigation.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.