Colorado Revised Statutes
Colo. Rev. Stat. § 13-5-127 (2026)
Duties of reporters
✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
CO-LEGleg.colorado.gov
JustiaTitle on Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
The shorthand reporter, on the direction of the court, shall take down in shorthand all the testimony, rulings of the court, exceptions taken, oral instructions given, and other proceedings had during the trial of any cause, and in such causes as the court may designate.
Source: L. 67: p. 454, § 8. C.R.S. 1963: § 37-12-32.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 6
cases (1 in the last 5 years), 1989–2026 · leading case: People v. Rodriguez, 914 P.2d 230 (Colo. 1996).
People v. Rodriguez, 914 P.2d 230 (Colo. 1996). “Section 13-5-127, 6A C.R.S. (1987), is analogous to the Court Reporter Act and provides: The shorthand reporter, on the direction of the court, shall take down in shorthand all the testimony, rulings of the court, exceptions taken, oral instructions given, and other proceedings…”
Jones v. Dist. Court Ex Rel. Second Jud. Dist., 780 P.2d 526 (Colo. 1989). “The duties of the court reporter for a district court are set out in section 13-5-127, 6A C.R.S. (1987), which provides, in pertinent part: Duties of reporters.”
People v. Rodriguez, 794 P.2d 965 (Colo. 1990). “§ 13-5-127, 6A C.R.S. (1987); Jones v. District Court, 780 P.”
A Just Cause v. United States, 45 F. Supp. 3d 1258 (D. Colo. 2014). “C.R.S. § 13-5-127. Under that statute, at the direction of the court a court reporter is required to record the proceedings during a trial.”
Peo v. Johnson (Colo. Ct. App. 2026). “1990) (first citing § 13-5-127, C.R.S. 2025; and then citing Jones v.”
The PEOPLE of the State of Colorado, Plaintiff-Appellee/Cross-Appellant v. Frank D. RODRIGUEZ, Defendant-Appellant/Cross-Appellee., 914 P.2d 230 (Colo. 1996). “Section 13-5-127, 6A C.R.S. ( 1987 ) , is analogous to the Court Reporter Act and provides: The shorthand reporter, on the direction of the court , shall take down in shorthand all the testimony, rulings of the court , exceptions taken, oral instructions given, and other…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.