Colorado Revised Statutes
Colo. Rev. Stat. § 14-13-301 (2026)
Definitions
✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
CO-LEGleg.colorado.gov
JustiaTitle on Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
As used in this part 3, unless the context otherwise requires:
(1) "Petitioner" means a person who seeks enforcement of an order for the return of a child under the "Hague Convention on the Civil Aspects of International Child Abduction" or enforcement of a child-custody determination.
(2) "Respondent" means a person against whom a proceeding has been commenced for enforcement of an order for the return of a child under the "Hague Convention on the Civil Aspects of International Child Abduction" or enforcement of a child-custody determination.
Source: L. 2000: Entire article R&RE, p. 1530, § 1, effective July 1.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 3
cases (1 in the last 5 years), 2004–2024 · leading case: People Ex Rel. Ajc, 88 P.3d 599 (Colo. 2004).
People Ex Rel. Ajc, 88 P.3d 599 (Colo. 2004). “The fact that Missouri continues to abide by a statute that has been expressly repealed by the Colorado legislature has no bearing on the jurisdiction of the Colorado courts.”
Responsibilities of W.F-L, 2018 COA 164 (Colo. Ct. App. 2018). “§ 1738A(a) (2018) (“The appropriate authorities of every State shall enforce according to its terms .”
Bryant v. McLean (D. Colo. 2024). “§ 25 [or] in the alternative C.R.S. § 14-13-301 et seq.,” is asserted against Defendant Angel in her individual capacity only.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.