(1) A person is presumed to be the natural parent
of a child if:
(a) The person and the parent who gave birth to the child are or have been married to
each other or are in a civil union pursuant to article 15 of title 14, and the child is born during the
marriage or civil union, within three hundred days after the marriage or civil union is terminated
by death, annulment, declaration of invalidity of marriage or civil union, dissolution of marriage
or civil union, or divorce, or after a decree of legal separation is entered by a court;
(b) Before the child's birth, the person and the parent who gave birth to the child have
attempted to marry each other by a marriage solemnized in apparent compliance with law or
attempted to enter into a civil union in apparent compliance with law, although the attempted
marriage or civil union is or could be declared invalid, and:
(I) If the attempted marriage or civil union could be declared invalid only by a court, the
child is born during the attempted marriage or civil union or within three hundred days after its
termination by death, annulment, declaration of invalidity of marriage or civil union, dissolution
of marriage or civil union, or divorce; or
(II) If the attempted marriage or civil union is invalid without a court order, the child is
born within three hundred days after the termination of cohabitation;
(c) After the child's birth, the person and the parent who gave birth to the child have
married or entered into a civil union, or attempted to marry each other by a marriage solemnized
in apparent compliance with law or enter into a civil union in apparent compliance with law,
although the attempted marriage or civil union is or could be declared invalid, and:
(I) The person has asserted parentage of the child in writing filed with the court or
registrar of vital statistics, if such acknowledgment has not previously become a legal finding
pursuant to subsection (2)(a.5) of this section;
(II) With the person's consent, the person is named as the child's parent on the child's
birth certificate; or
(III) The person is obligated to support the child under a written voluntary promise or by
court order or by an administrative order issued pursuant to section 26-13.5-110;
(d) While the child is under the age of majority, the person receives the child into the
person's home and openly holds out the child as the person's natural child;
(e) (Deleted by amendment, L. 2022.)
(f) The genetic tests or other tests of inherited characteristics have been administered
pursuant to section 13-25-126, and the results show that the alleged genetic parent is not
excluded as the probable genetic parent and that the probability of the person's genetic parentage
is ninety-seven percent or higher. This subsection (1)(f) does not apply to a donor as defined in
section 19-1-103.
(2) (a) A presumption of parentage pursuant to subsection (1) of this section may be
rebutted in an appropriate action only by clear and convincing evidence. If two or more
conflicting presumptions arise, the presumption that, on the facts, is founded on the weightier
considerations of policy and logic controls. The presumption is rebutted by a court decree
establishing parentage of the child by another person other than the parent who gave birth. In
determining which of two or more conflicting presumptions controls, based upon the weightier
considerations of policy and logic, the judge or magistrate shall consider all pertinent factors,
including but not limited to the following:
(I) The length of time between the proceeding to determine parentage and the time that
the presumed parent was placed on notice that the presumed parent might not be the genetic
parent, unless the child was conceived through an assisted reproductive procedure;
(II) The length of time during which the presumed parent has assumed the role of the
child's parent;
(III) The facts surrounding the presumed parent's discovery of the possibility that the
presumed parent was not a genetic parent, unless the child was conceived through an assisted
reproductive procedure;
(IV) The nature of the existing parent-child relationship;
(V) The child's age;
(VI) The child's relationship to any presumed parent or parents;
(VII) The extent to which the passage of time reduces the chances of establishing
another person's parentage and a child support obligation in favor of the child; and
(VIII) Any other factors that may affect the equities arising from the disruption of the
parent-child relationship between the child and the presumed parent or parents or the chance of
other harm to the child.
(a.5) (I) A person and the parent who gave birth to the child may sign a voluntary
acknowledgment of parentage to establish the parentage of the child. A voluntary
acknowledgment of parentage may be signed by a parent who gave birth to the child and either:
(A) Another person who is or believes themselves to be a genetic parent; or
(B) Another person who is an intended parent of a child conceived through an assisted
reproductive procedure.
(II) A married person or person in a civil union who gives birth to a child may only sign
a voluntary acknowledgment of parentage with a person who is not the married person's spouse
or civil union partner if the spouse or civil union partner signs a denial of parentage.
(b) A duly executed voluntary acknowledgment of parentage takes effect upon the filing
of the document with the state registrar of vital statistics and may be rescinded within the earlier
of:
(I) Sixty days after execution of such acknowledgment; or
(II) On the date of any administrative or judicial proceeding pursuant to this article or
any administrative or judicial proceeding concerning the support of a child to which the
signatory is a party.
(c) An acknowledgment of parentage may be challenged in court only on the basis of
fraud, duress, or mistake of material fact, with the burden of proof upon the challenger. Any
legal responsibilities resulting from signing an acknowledgment of parentage, including child
support obligations, continue during any challenge to the finding of parentage, except for good
cause shown.
(d) Except as otherwise provided in subsections (2)(b) and (2)(c) of this section, a
voluntary acknowledgment of parentage that complies with this section and section 25-2-112,
and is filed with the state registrar of vital statistics, is equivalent to an adjudication of parentage
of the child and confers on the acknowledged parent all rights and duties of a parent. The court
shall give full faith and credit to a voluntary acknowledgment of parentage that is effective in
another state, including a federally recognized Indian tribe, if the acknowledgment was in a
signed record and otherwise complies with the laws of the other state or federally recognized
Indian tribe.
Source: L. 87: Entire title R&RE, p. 793, § 1, effective October 1. L. 89: (1)(c)(III)
amended, p. 1247, § 3, effective April 1. L. 91: (1)(f) amended, p. 253, § 10, effective July 1. L.
97: (1)(c)(I), (1)(e), and (2) amended, p. 1274, § 13, effective July 1. L. 2003: (2)(a) amended, p.
1268, § 59, effective July 1. L. 2008: (2)(c) amended, p. 1656, § 2, effective August 15. L. 2022:
Entire section amended, (HB 22-1153), ch. 210, p. 1389, § 4, effective August 10. L. 2023:
IP(2)(b) amended, (SB 23-173), ch. 330, p. 1982, § 22, effective June 2. L. 2024: (1)(f)
amended, (HB 24-1450), ch. 490, p. 3412, § 28, effective August 7.
Editor's note: This section was contained in a title that was repealed and reenacted in
1987. Provisions of this section, as it existed in 1987, are similar to those contained in § 19-6-
105 as said section existed in 1986, the year prior to the repeal and reenactment of this title.
Cross references: For the legislative declaration contained in the 1997 act amending
subsections (1)(c)(I), (1)(e), and (2), see section 1 of chapter 236, Session Laws of Colorado
1997.
19-4-105.5. Commencement of proceedings - summons - automatic temporary
injunction - enforcement. (1) All proceedings under this article shall be commenced in the
manner provided by the Colorado rules of civil procedure or as otherwise provided in this
section or section 26-13.5-104, C.R.S.
(2) Upon commencement of a proceeding under this article by one of the parties, the
other parties shall be served in the manner set forth in section 19-4-109 (2), the Colorado rules of
civil procedure, or as otherwise provided in section 26-13.5-104, C.R.S.
(2.5) Upon the commencement of a proceeding under this article, each party shall
provide to the court, in the manner prescribed by the court, his or her social security number and
the social security number of each child who is the subject of the proceeding under this article.
(3) Proceedings under this article may be commenced prior to the birth of a child.
(4) If a petition is filed by an alleged father or possible father pursuant to the
requirements of section 19-5-103.7, the licensed child placement agency involved shall receive
notice of the action in the same manner as a party to the action.
(5) A summons issued upon commencement of a proceeding under this article shall
contain the following advisements and notice:
(a) That a request for genetic tests shall not prejudice the requesting party in matters
concerning allocation of parental responsibilities pursuant to section 14-10-124 (1.5), C.R.S.;
(b) That, if genetic tests are not obtained prior to a legal establishment of paternity and
submitted into evidence prior to the entry of the final order establishing paternity, the genetic
tests may not be allowed into evidence at a later date; and
(c) (I) That, except in proceedings initiated pursuant to section 14-10-124.4 or in
proceedings initiated by a delegate child support enforcement unit, as defined in section 26-13-
102.5 (1), pursuant to article 13 or 13.5 of title 26, or article 5 of title 14, upon personal service
of the petition and summons on a respondent or upon waiver and acceptance of service by a
respondent, a temporary injunction shall be in effect against both parties:
(A) Enjoining each party from molesting or disturbing the peace of the other party;
(B) Restraining each party from removing a minor child who is the subject of a
proceeding under this article from the state without the consent of all other parties or an order of
the court modifying the injunction; and
(C) Restraining each party, without at least fourteen days' advance notification and the
written consent of all other parties or an order of the court modifying the injunction, from
canceling, modifying, terminating, or allowing to lapse for nonpayment of premiums, a policy of
health insurance or life insurance that provides coverage to a minor child who is the subject of
the proceeding or that names the minor child as a beneficiary of a policy.
(II) The temporary injunction shall be in effect upon personal service of the petition and
summons on a respondent or upon waiver and acceptance of service by a respondent and shall
remain in effect for one hundred twenty days after its effective date unless all parties consent to a
modification of the temporary injunction. The court may, upon the motion of a party or upon its
own motion, modify the length of time the temporary injunction is in effect to a shorter or longer
period of time as the court deems appropriate.
(6) The provisions of the temporary injunction described in subsection (5) of this section
shall be printed on the summons and the petition. A party may apply to the court for further
temporary orders, an expanded temporary injunction, or modification or revocation of the
temporary injunction.
(7) For purposes of enforcing the automatic temporary injunction described in paragraph
(c) of subsection (5) of this section, if a respondent shows a duly authorized peace officer, as
described in section 16-2.5-101, C.R.S., a copy of the petition and summons filed and issued
pursuant to this section, or if a petitioner shows the peace officer a copy of the petition and
summons filed and issued pursuant to this section together with a certified copy of the affidavit
of service of process or a certified copy of the waiver and acceptance of service, and the peace
officer has cause to believe that a violation of the part of the automatic temporary injunction that
enjoins a party from molesting or disturbing the peace of the other party has occurred, the peace
officer shall use every reasonable means to enforce that part of the injunction against the
petitioner or respondent, as applicable. A peace officer shall not be held civilly or criminally
liable for his or her actions pursuant to this subsection (7) if the peace officer acts in good faith
and without malice.
Source: L. 94: Entire section added, p. 1541, § 13, effective May 31. L. 96: Entire
section amended, p. 612, § 13, effective July 1. L. 2005: (3) and (4) added, p. 102, § 3, effective
July 1; (5) added, p. 378, § 3, effective January 1, 2006. L. 2006: (5)(b) amended, p. 516, § 2,
effective August 7. L. 2010: (5) amended and (6) and (7) added, (HB 10-1097), ch. 39, p. 158, §
1, effective August 15. L. 2011: (2.5) added, (SB 11-123), ch. 46, p. 119, § 5, effective August
10. L. 2023: IP(5)(c)(I) amended, (HB 23-1026), ch. 243, p. 1307, § 7, effective August 7.
Cross references: For the short title ("Grandparents' Rights for Aaliyah and Myah Act")
in HB 23-1026, see section 1 of chapter 243, Session Laws of Colorado 2023.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in
64
cases (
17 in the last 5 years), 1988–2026 · leading case:
People ex rel. C.L.S., 313 P.3d 662 (Colo. Ct. App. 2011).
People ex rel. C.L.S., 313 P.3d 662 (Colo. Ct. App. 2011).
· cites it 52× “At least five of the eight factors focus on the child, such as "[t] he length of time during which the presumed father has assumed the role of father of the child," *668 section 19-4-105(@)(a)(Il); "[the nature of the father-child relationship," section 19-4-105(@)(a)(IV); "[t]…”
People ex rel. J.G.C., 318 P.3d 576 (Colo. Ct. App. 2013).
· cites it 22× “T4 LCDSS then moved to dismiss presumptive father from the petition, arguing that under section 19-4-105, C.R.S.2013, the test results established that he was not the biological father, and thus, clearly and convincingly rebutted the presumption created by his name being on the…”
People in Interest of RTL, 780 P.2d 508 (Colo. 1989).
· cites it 79× “[4] Any presumption of paternity established under section 19-4-105 may be rebutted in an appropriate action by clear and convincing evidence or by a court decree establishing paternity of the child by another man.”
N.A.H. v. S.L.S., 9 P.3d 354 (Colo. 2000).
· cites it 37× “See § 19-4-105(@)(a), 6 C.R.S. (1999). He then stated, In this case the logically persuasive presumption is that the DNA testing is the most accurate way to determine who the father of the child may be.”
in Interest of M.B, 2020 COA 13 (Colo. Ct. App. 2020).
· cites it 4× “Then, “[t]he result 6 A presumption of paternity may arise under a variety of circumstances as provided by section 19-4-105(1)(a)-(f), C.R.S. 2019. 20 of a final determination of paternity is to render one presumptive father the child’s parent.”
In re the Parental Responsibilities of A.R.L., 318 P.3d 581 (Colo. Ct. App. 2013).
· cites it 10× “See § 19-4-105, C.R.S.2018 (parent-child relationship may be demonstrated by, among other things, marriage, a written acknowledgment of paternity, consent to be named on the birth certificate, a promise to pay child support, or receiving the child into one's home and holding the…”
In re Marriage of Hogsett & Neale, 2021 CO 1 (Colo. 2021).
· cites it 2× “(2020) (making it a class 4 felony to knowingly marry an ancestor or descendant); § 19-4-105, C.R.S. (2020) (presuming parentage of both spouses for child born to married couple); and Denver Rev.”
In re the Marriage of Edi L. HOGSETT v. Marcia E. NEALE, 478 P.3d 713 (Colo. 2021).
· cites it 2× “( 2020 ) ( making it a class 4 felony to knowingly marry an ancestor or descendant ) ; § 19-4-105, C.R.S. ( 2020 ) ( presuming parentage of both spouses for child born to married couple ) ; and Denver Rev.”
In the Interest of S.N.V., 284 P.3d 147 (Colo. Ct. App. 2011).
· cites it 24× “As pertinent here, the list includes any man presumed to be the child's father under section 19-4-105, C.R.S.2011. 2 Terms interchangeable.”
In re the Parental Responsibilities of A.D., 240 P.3d 488 (Colo. Ct. App. 2010).
· cites it 27× “Section 19-4-105(@2)(a), C.R.S.2009, provides that the presumption "may be rebutted in an appropriate action only by clear and convincing evidence" and that "(tlhe presumption is rebutted by a court decree establishing paternity of the child by another man.”
W.C. ex rel. A.M.K., 907 P.2d 719 (Colo. Ct. App. 1995).
· cites it 12× “138, § 19-4-105(1)00 and § 13-25-126, C.R.S. (1987 Repl.”
People ex rel. J.A.U. v. R.L.C., 47 P.3d 327 (Colo. 2002).
· cites it 18× “'s motion for genetic testing essentially alleged that the judgment of paternity was based on a mistake of material fact and thus placed the original judgment of paternity at issue; and (8) that there exists no time limit to when a challenge to a legal determination of paternity…”
— Colo. Rev. Stat. § 19-4-105(1) — 17 cases
People in Interest of RTL, 780 P.2d 508 (Colo. 1989).
“[4] Any presumption of paternity established under section 19-4-105 may be rebutted in an appropriate action by clear and convincing evidence or by a court decree establishing paternity of the child by another man.”
People ex rel. C.L.S., 313 P.3d 662 (Colo. Ct. App. 2011).
“At least five of the eight factors focus on the child, such as "[t] he length of time during which the presumed father has assumed the role of father of the child," *668 section 19-4-105(@)(a)(Il); "[the nature of the father-child relationship," section 19-4-105(@)(a)(IV); "[t]…”
N.A.H. v. S.L.S., 9 P.3d 354 (Colo. 2000).
“See § 19-4-105(@)(a), 6 C.R.S. (1999). He then stated, In this case the logically persuasive presumption is that the DNA testing is the most accurate way to determine who the father of the child may be.”
In re the Parental Responsibilities of A.D., 240 P.3d 488 (Colo. Ct. App. 2010).
“Section 19-4-105(@2)(a), C.R.S.2009, provides that the presumption "may be rebutted in an appropriate action only by clear and convincing evidence" and that "(tlhe presumption is rebutted by a court decree establishing paternity of the child by another man.”
W.C. ex rel. A.M.K., 907 P.2d 719 (Colo. Ct. App. 1995).
“138, § 19-4-105(1)00 and § 13-25-126, C.R.S. (1987 Repl.”
— Colo. Rev. Stat. § 19-4-105(1)(0) — 1 case
People ex rel. C.L.S., 313 P.3d 662 (Colo. Ct. App. 2011).
“At least five of the eight factors focus on the child, such as "[t] he length of time during which the presumed father has assumed the role of father of the child," *668 section 19-4-105(@)(a)(Il); "[the nature of the father-child relationship," section 19-4-105(@)(a)(IV); "[t]…”
— Colo. Rev. Stat. § 19-4-105(1)(F) — 3 cases
People ex rel. C.L.S., 313 P.3d 662 (Colo. Ct. App. 2011).
“At least five of the eight factors focus on the child, such as "[t] he length of time during which the presumed father has assumed the role of father of the child," *668 section 19-4-105(@)(a)(Il); "[the nature of the father-child relationship," section 19-4-105(@)(a)(IV); "[t]…”
N.A.H. v. S.L.S., 9 P.3d 354 (Colo. 2000).
“See § 19-4-105(@)(a), 6 C.R.S. (1999). He then stated, In this case the logically persuasive presumption is that the DNA testing is the most accurate way to determine who the father of the child may be.”
— Colo. Rev. Stat. § 19-4-105(1)(Ff) — 1 case
N.A.H. v. S.L.S., 9 P.3d 354 (Colo. 2000).
“See § 19-4-105(@)(a), 6 C.R.S. (1999). He then stated, In this case the logically persuasive presumption is that the DNA testing is the most accurate way to determine who the father of the child may be.”
— Colo. Rev. Stat. § 19-4-105(1)(a) — 26 cases
People in Interest of RTL, 780 P.2d 508 (Colo. 1989).
“[4] Any presumption of paternity established under section 19-4-105 may be rebutted in an appropriate action by clear and convincing evidence or by a court decree establishing paternity of the child by another man.”
in Interest of M.B, 2020 COA 13 (Colo. Ct. App. 2020).
“Then, “[t]he result 6 A presumption of paternity may arise under a variety of circumstances as provided by section 19-4-105(1)(a)-(f), C.R.S. 2019. 20 of a final determination of paternity is to render one presumptive father the child’s parent.”
People ex rel. C.L.S., 313 P.3d 662 (Colo. Ct. App. 2011).
“At least five of the eight factors focus on the child, such as "[t] he length of time during which the presumed father has assumed the role of father of the child," *668 section 19-4-105(@)(a)(Il); "[the nature of the father-child relationship," section 19-4-105(@)(a)(IV); "[t]…”
N.A.H. v. S.L.S., 9 P.3d 354 (Colo. 2000).
“See § 19-4-105(@)(a), 6 C.R.S. (1999). He then stated, In this case the logically persuasive presumption is that the DNA testing is the most accurate way to determine who the father of the child may be.”
In the Interest of S.N.V., 284 P.3d 147 (Colo. Ct. App. 2011).
“As pertinent here, the list includes any man presumed to be the child's father under section 19-4-105, C.R.S.2011. 2 Terms interchangeable.”
— Colo. Rev. Stat. § 19-4-105(1)(b) — 3 cases
N.A.H. v. S.L.S., 9 P.3d 354 (Colo. 2000).
“See § 19-4-105(@)(a), 6 C.R.S. (1999). He then stated, In this case the logically persuasive presumption is that the DNA testing is the most accurate way to determine who the father of the child may be.”
People in Interest of RTL, 780 P.2d 508 (Colo. 1989).
“[4] Any presumption of paternity established under section 19-4-105 may be rebutted in an appropriate action by clear and convincing evidence or by a court decree establishing paternity of the child by another man.”
— Colo. Rev. Stat. § 19-4-105(1)(c)(I) — 2 cases
People in Interest of RTL, 780 P.2d 508 (Colo. 1989).
“[4] Any presumption of paternity established under section 19-4-105 may be rebutted in an appropriate action by clear and convincing evidence or by a court decree establishing paternity of the child by another man.”
— Colo. Rev. Stat. § 19-4-105(1)(c)(II) — 2 cases
— Colo. Rev. Stat. § 19-4-105(1)(c)(III) — 1 case
People in Interest of RTL, 780 P.2d 508 (Colo. 1989).
“[4] Any presumption of paternity established under section 19-4-105 may be rebutted in an appropriate action by clear and convincing evidence or by a court decree establishing paternity of the child by another man.”
— Colo. Rev. Stat. § 19-4-105(1)(d) — 24 cases
In re the Parental Responsibilities of A.R.L., 318 P.3d 581 (Colo. Ct. App. 2013).
“See § 19-4-105, C.R.S.2018 (parent-child relationship may be demonstrated by, among other things, marriage, a written acknowledgment of paternity, consent to be named on the birth certificate, a promise to pay child support, or receiving the child into one's home and holding the…”
People ex rel. C.L.S., 313 P.3d 662 (Colo. Ct. App. 2011).
“At least five of the eight factors focus on the child, such as "[t] he length of time during which the presumed father has assumed the role of father of the child," *668 section 19-4-105(@)(a)(Il); "[the nature of the father-child relationship," section 19-4-105(@)(a)(IV); "[t]…”
In re the Parental Responsibilities of A.D., 240 P.3d 488 (Colo. Ct. App. 2010).
“Section 19-4-105(@2)(a), C.R.S.2009, provides that the presumption "may be rebutted in an appropriate action only by clear and convincing evidence" and that "(tlhe presumption is rebutted by a court decree establishing paternity of the child by another man.”
— Colo. Rev. Stat. § 19-4-105(1)(e) — 14 cases
People ex rel. J.G.C., 318 P.3d 576 (Colo. Ct. App. 2013).
“T4 LCDSS then moved to dismiss presumptive father from the petition, arguing that under section 19-4-105, C.R.S.2013, the test results established that he was not the biological father, and thus, clearly and convincingly rebutted the presumption created by his name being on the…”
in Interest of M.B, 2020 COA 13 (Colo. Ct. App. 2020).
“Then, “[t]he result 6 A presumption of paternity may arise under a variety of circumstances as provided by section 19-4-105(1)(a)-(f), C.R.S. 2019. 20 of a final determination of paternity is to render one presumptive father the child’s parent.”
People ex rel. C.L.S., 313 P.3d 662 (Colo. Ct. App. 2011).
“At least five of the eight factors focus on the child, such as "[t] he length of time during which the presumed father has assumed the role of father of the child," *668 section 19-4-105(@)(a)(Il); "[the nature of the father-child relationship," section 19-4-105(@)(a)(IV); "[t]…”
N.A.H. v. S.L.S., 9 P.3d 354 (Colo. 2000).
“See § 19-4-105(@)(a), 6 C.R.S. (1999). He then stated, In this case the logically persuasive presumption is that the DNA testing is the most accurate way to determine who the father of the child may be.”
People in Interest of RTL, 780 P.2d 508 (Colo. 1989).
“[4] Any presumption of paternity established under section 19-4-105 may be rebutted in an appropriate action by clear and convincing evidence or by a court decree establishing paternity of the child by another man.”
— Colo. Rev. Stat. § 19-4-105(1)(f) — 21 cases
People ex rel. J.G.C., 318 P.3d 576 (Colo. Ct. App. 2013).
“T4 LCDSS then moved to dismiss presumptive father from the petition, arguing that under section 19-4-105, C.R.S.2013, the test results established that he was not the biological father, and thus, clearly and convincingly rebutted the presumption created by his name being on the…”
In re the Parental Responsibilities of A.R.L., 318 P.3d 581 (Colo. Ct. App. 2013).
“See § 19-4-105, C.R.S.2018 (parent-child relationship may be demonstrated by, among other things, marriage, a written acknowledgment of paternity, consent to be named on the birth certificate, a promise to pay child support, or receiving the child into one's home and holding the…”
N.A.H. v. S.L.S., 9 P.3d 354 (Colo. 2000).
“See § 19-4-105(@)(a), 6 C.R.S. (1999). He then stated, In this case the logically persuasive presumption is that the DNA testing is the most accurate way to determine who the father of the child may be.”
— Colo. Rev. Stat. § 19-4-105(2) — 22 cases
People ex rel. J.G.C., 318 P.3d 576 (Colo. Ct. App. 2013).
“T4 LCDSS then moved to dismiss presumptive father from the petition, arguing that under section 19-4-105, C.R.S.2013, the test results established that he was not the biological father, and thus, clearly and convincingly rebutted the presumption created by his name being on the…”
People in Interest of RTL, 780 P.2d 508 (Colo. 1989).
“[4] Any presumption of paternity established under section 19-4-105 may be rebutted in an appropriate action by clear and convincing evidence or by a court decree establishing paternity of the child by another man.”
People ex rel. C.L.S., 313 P.3d 662 (Colo. Ct. App. 2011).
“At least five of the eight factors focus on the child, such as "[t] he length of time during which the presumed father has assumed the role of father of the child," *668 section 19-4-105(@)(a)(Il); "[the nature of the father-child relationship," section 19-4-105(@)(a)(IV); "[t]…”
W.C. ex rel. A.M.K., 907 P.2d 719 (Colo. Ct. App. 1995).
“138, § 19-4-105(1)00 and § 13-25-126, C.R.S. (1987 Repl.”
— Colo. Rev. Stat. § 19-4-105(2)(a) — 22 cases
People ex rel. C.L.S., 313 P.3d 662 (Colo. Ct. App. 2011).
“At least five of the eight factors focus on the child, such as "[t] he length of time during which the presumed father has assumed the role of father of the child," *668 section 19-4-105(@)(a)(Il); "[the nature of the father-child relationship," section 19-4-105(@)(a)(IV); "[t]…”
People ex rel. J.G.C., 318 P.3d 576 (Colo. Ct. App. 2013).
“T4 LCDSS then moved to dismiss presumptive father from the petition, arguing that under section 19-4-105, C.R.S.2013, the test results established that he was not the biological father, and thus, clearly and convincingly rebutted the presumption created by his name being on the…”
in Interest of M.B, 2020 COA 13 (Colo. Ct. App. 2020).
“Then, “[t]he result 6 A presumption of paternity may arise under a variety of circumstances as provided by section 19-4-105(1)(a)-(f), C.R.S. 2019. 20 of a final determination of paternity is to render one presumptive father the child’s parent.”
N.A.H. v. S.L.S., 9 P.3d 354 (Colo. 2000).
“See § 19-4-105(@)(a), 6 C.R.S. (1999). He then stated, In this case the logically persuasive presumption is that the DNA testing is the most accurate way to determine who the father of the child may be.”
— Colo. Rev. Stat. § 19-4-105(2)(a)(I) — 8 cases
— Colo. Rev. Stat. § 19-4-105(2)(a)(ID) — 1 case
People ex rel. C.L.S., 313 P.3d 662 (Colo. Ct. App. 2011).
“At least five of the eight factors focus on the child, such as "[t] he length of time during which the presumed father has assumed the role of father of the child," *668 section 19-4-105(@)(a)(Il); "[the nature of the father-child relationship," section 19-4-105(@)(a)(IV); "[t]…”
— Colo. Rev. Stat. § 19-4-105(2)(b) — 4 cases
N.A.H. v. S.L.S., 9 P.3d 354 (Colo. 2000).
“See § 19-4-105(@)(a), 6 C.R.S. (1999). He then stated, In this case the logically persuasive presumption is that the DNA testing is the most accurate way to determine who the father of the child may be.”
— Colo. Rev. Stat. § 19-4-105(2)(c) — 5 cases
People ex rel. J.A.U. v. R.L.C., 47 P.3d 327 (Colo. 2002).
“'s motion for genetic testing essentially alleged that the judgment of paternity was based on a mistake of material fact and thus placed the original judgment of paternity at issue; and (8) that there exists no time limit to when a challenge to a legal determination of paternity…”
In Re Cls, 252 P.3d 556 (Colo. Ct. App. 2011).
— Colo. Rev. Stat. § 19-4-105(l)(a) — 7 cases
People in Interest of RTL, 780 P.2d 508 (Colo. 1989).
“[4] Any presumption of paternity established under section 19-4-105 may be rebutted in an appropriate action by clear and convincing evidence or by a court decree establishing paternity of the child by another man.”
W.C. ex rel. A.M.K., 907 P.2d 719 (Colo. Ct. App. 1995).
“138, § 19-4-105(1)00 and § 13-25-126, C.R.S. (1987 Repl.”
— Colo. Rev. Stat. § 19-4-105(l)(d) — 1 case
— Colo. Rev. Stat. § 19-4-105(l)(e) — 2 cases
People ex rel. J.G.C., 318 P.3d 576 (Colo. Ct. App. 2013).
“T4 LCDSS then moved to dismiss presumptive father from the petition, arguing that under section 19-4-105, C.R.S.2013, the test results established that he was not the biological father, and thus, clearly and convincingly rebutted the presumption created by his name being on the…”
People in Interest of RTL, 780 P.2d 508 (Colo. 1989).
“[4] Any presumption of paternity established under section 19-4-105 may be rebutted in an appropriate action by clear and convincing evidence or by a court decree establishing paternity of the child by another man.”
— Colo. Rev. Stat. § 19-4-105(l)(f) — 4 cases
W.C. ex rel. A.M.K., 907 P.2d 719 (Colo. Ct. App. 1995).
“138, § 19-4-105(1)00 and § 13-25-126, C.R.S. (1987 Repl.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.