Colo. Rev. Stat. » Title 24
Colorado Revised Statutes

Colo. Rev. Stat. § 24-72-206 (2026)

Violation - penalty

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section CO-LEGleg.colorado.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

(Repealed)

Source: L. 68: p. 204, § 6. C.R.S. 1963: § 113-2-6. L. 2017: Entire section repealed, (SB 17-040), ch. 286, p. 1584, § 3, effective August 9.

PART 3

CRIMINAL JUSTICE RECORDS

Law reviews: For article, "Procedures and Ethical Questions Under the Colorado Criminal Justice Records Act", see 14 Colo. Law. 2193 (1985); for article, "'Columbine' and Colorado's Records Acts", see 45 Colo. Law. 45 (Sept. 2016).

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 4 cases, 1988–2013 · leading case: Griffin v. SW Devanney & Co., Inc., 775 P.2d 555 (Colo. 1989).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Griffin v. SW Devanney & Co., Inc., 775 P.2d 555 (Colo. 1989). · cites it 2× “Section 24-72-206, 10B C.R.S. (1988), makes it a misdemeanor to willfully and knowingly violate the provisions of the Public Records Act.”
Shields v. Shetler, 682 F. Supp. 1172 (D. Colo. 1988). · cites it 4× “Under Colo.Rev.Stat. § 24-72-206: "Any person who willfully and knowingly violates the provisions of this part 2 is guilty of a misdemeanor and, upon conviction thereof, shall be punished by a fine of not more than one hundred dollars, or by imprisonment in the county jail for…”
Citizens Progressive All. v. Sw. Water Conservation Dist., 97 P.3d 308 (Colo. Ct. App. 2004). · cites it 2× “In these circumstances, SWCD was entitled to have the court determine whether it was required under CORA to respond to that request within the statutory time limits; and it did not have to risk the monetary and other sanctions it would face upon failure to comply with CORA, see…”
McDonald v. Miller, 945 F. Supp. 2d 1201 (D. Colo. 2013). “” C.R.S. 24-72-206. In response to this truism, McDonald recasts the claim in terms of the “legitimate expectation” of privacy analysis for discovery disclosures under Martinelli v.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.