In re Jesus C., 581 A.2d 1055 (Conn. 1990). · Go Syfert
In re Jesus C., 581 A.2d 1055 (Conn. 1990). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
54 citation events (20 in the last 25 years) across 4 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Georges v. OB-GYN Services, P.C. (conn, 2020-06-03)
Treatment trajectory · 1991 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1991 2008 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 8 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "see" Georges v. OB-GYN Services, P.C.
Conn. · 2020 · signal: see · confidence high
See Paine Web- ber Jackson & Curtis, Inc. v. Winters, 22 Conn. App. 640 , 652–54, 579 A.2d 545 (explaining that, unlike discre- tionary prejudgment interest, which ‘‘constitutes an ele- ment of the damages awarded,’’ offer of compromise interest is ‘‘unrelated to the underlying [damages claim]’’), cert. denied, 216 Conn. 820 , 581 A.2d 1055 (1990).
discussed Cited "see" Georges v. OB-GYN Services, P.C.
Conn. · 2020 · signal: see · confidence high
See Paine Web- ber Jackson & Curtis, Inc. v. Winters, 22 Conn. App. 640 , 652–54, 579 A.2d 545 (explaining that, unlike discre- tionary prejudgment interest, which ‘‘constitutes an ele- ment of the damages awarded,’’ offer of compromise interest is ‘‘unrelated to the underlying [damages claim]’’), cert. denied, 216 Conn. 820 , 581 A.2d 1055 (1990).
cited Cited "see" Porter v. Thrane
Conn. App. Ct. · 2006 · signal: see · confidence high
See Greger v. Greger, 22 Conn. App. 596 , 600 n.3, 578 A.2d 162 , cert. denied, 216 Conn. 820 , 581 A.2d 1055 (1990).
discussed Cited "see" Weinstein v. Weinstein
Conn. · 2005 · signal: see · confidence high
See Greger v. Greger, 22 Conn. App. 596, 600 , 578 A.2d 162 (concluding that trial court properly found that defendant’s conduct was “deliberate, fraudulent and egregious concealment of assets” when defendant had represented in his affidavit that his closely held insurance business had no value although he knew, at time affidavit was filed, exactly how much he would be receiving from sale of business), cert. denied, 216 Conn. 820 , 581 A.2d 1055 (1990).
discussed Cited "see" State v. Morales (2×)
Conn. App. Ct. · 2005 · signal: see · confidence high
See State v. Linares, 232 Conn. 345, 381 , 655 A.2d 737 (1995). 6 The defendant argues in his brief that a trilogy of cases, State v. Johnson, 214 Conn. 161 , 571 A.2d 79 (1990), State v. Williamson, 212 Conn. 6 , 562 A.2d 470 (1989), and In re Jesus C., 21 Conn. App. 645, 575 A.2d 1031 , appeal dismissed, 216 Conn. 819 , 581 A.2d 1055 (1990), require the trial court, prior to employing the Asherman test, to determine which side bears the burden of proof.
cited Cited "see" Bartels v. Bartels
Conn. App. Ct. · 2004 · signal: see · confidence high
See Bonelli v. Bonelli, 22 Conn. App. 248, 252 , 576 A.2d 587 , cert. denied, 216 Conn. 819 , 581 A.2d 1054 (1990).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Mariculture Products Ltd. v. Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's of London
Conn. App. Ct. · 2004 · signal: see also · confidence low
Douthett & Co., 18 Conn. App. 245, 250 , 557 A.2d 927 (our statutes, rules of practice set forth procedural scheme), cert. denied, 212 Conn. 802 , 560 A.2d 984 (1989); see also Paine Webber Jackson & Curtis, Inc. v. Winters, 22 Conn. App. 640, 650 , 579 A.2d 545 (general rule that forum state applies own procedure), cert. denied, 216 Conn. 820 , 581 A.2d 1055 (1990); 1 Restatement (Second), Conflict of Laws § 128 (1971). 13 Section 2436 of title 24-A of the Maine Revised Statutes provides: “1.
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Smith v. Bridgeport Futures Initiative, Inc., No. 326697 (Aug. 13, 1996)
Conn. Super. Ct. · 1996 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
Also, a principal or employer who has ratified and adopted the libelous publication may be held liable." 53 C.J.S., Libel Slander, § 117; see, e.g., Paine Webber Jackson Curtis, Inc. v. Winters, 22 Conn. App. 640 , 643-646 , 579 A.2d 545 (1990), cert. denied, 216 Conn. 820 , 581 A.2d 1055 (1990).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
In re Jesus C.
Supreme Court of Connecticut.
Oct 4, 1990.
581 A.2d 1055
Mitchell S. Brody, assistant state’s attorney, in support of the petition., Temmy Ann Pieszak, assistant public defender, in opposition.
Published

The state of Connecticut’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 21 Conn. App. 645, is dismissed.