Connecticut General Statutes

Conn. Gen. Stat. § 17b-285 (2026)

(Formerly Sec. 17-134gg). Assignment of spousal support of an institutionalized person or person in need of institutional care

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section CT-CGAcga.ct.gov (official) JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
Notwithstanding any provision of the general statutes, an institutionalized person or person in need of institutional care who applies for Medicaid may assign to the Commissioner of Social Services the right of support derived from the assets of the community spouse of such person but only if (1) the assets of the institutionalized person or person in need of institutional care do not exceed the Medicaid program asset limit; and (2) the institutionalized person or person in need of institutional care cannot locate the community spouse; or the community spouse is unable to provide information regarding his or her own assets. If such assignment is made or if the institutionalized person or person in need of institutional care lacks the ability to execute such an assignment due to physical or mental impairment, the commissioner may seek recovery of any medical assistance paid on behalf of the institutionalized person or person in need of institutional care up to the amount of the community spouse's assets that are in excess of the community spouse protected amount as of the initial month of Medicaid eligibility.

(P.A. 91-396; P.A. 93-262, S. 1; June Sp. Sess. P.A. 07-2, S. 6.)

History: P.A. 93-262 authorized substitution of commissioner and department of social services for commissioner and department of income maintenance, effective July 1, 1993; Sec. 17-134gg transferred to Sec. 17b-285 in 1995; June Sp. Sess. P.A. 07-2 inserted “Notwithstanding any provision of the general statutes”, replaced “shall” with “may” re assigning right of support to commissioner, replaced “spouse” with “community Spouse”, revised criteria re when person applying for Medicaid may assign to commissioner the right to support derived from assets of a spouse, specified that assignments may be made only if assets of institutionalized person or person in need of institutional care do not exceed Medicaid program asset limit and such person cannot locate the community spouse, or the community spouse is unable to provide information regarding assets, deleted provision re bringing support proceeding against applicant's spouse without assignment and added provision re commissioner's authority to seek recovery of medical assistance paid on behalf of institutionalized person or person in need of institutional care, effective July 1, 2007.

Cited. 233 C. 557.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 1 case, 2004–2004 · leading case: Morenz v. Wilson-Coker, 321 F. Supp. 2d 398 (D. Conn. 2004).
Morenz v. Wilson-Coker, 321 F. Supp. 2d 398 (D. Conn. 2004). · cites it 5× “Conn. Gen.Stat. § 17b-285, and: The applicant of [sic] Medicaid benefits must assign to [DSS] rights to support available from the assets of the community spouse when the community spouse is unable to provide the information necessary to complete an assessment of spousal assets.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.