Conn. Gen. Stat. § 20-122 (2026)
Ownership and operation of offices by unlicensed persons or by corporations. Penalty. Exception
(b) Any licensed practitioner who provides dental services in a dental office or other location in violation of subsection (a) of this section shall be subject to disciplinary action under sections 19a-17 and 20-114.
(c) Notwithstanding the provisions of subsections (a) and (b) of this section or chapter 594a, a professional service corporation whose capital stock is held by or under the control of a personal representative or the estate of a deceased or incompetent dentist may operate a dental office or other location for the purpose of rendering professional dental services for a reasonable period of time, not to exceed eighteen months from the date of the dentist's death or the date the dentist is lawfully determined to be incompetent, whichever is applicable.
(1949 Rev., S. 4444, 4445; P.A. 73-206, S. 1; P.A. 87-139, S. 2; P.A. 92-35, S. 7; P.A. 05-272, S. 20.)
History: P.A. 73-206 added exception re professional service corporations in prohibition concerning ownership of dentistry concern, deleted exception for Hartford dispensary and exempted convalescent homes where dentist provided care directly for patient rather than for home; P.A. 87-139 deleted requirement that dentist provide care directly for patient rather than home for exemption of convalescent home from the requirements of this section; P.A. 92-35 added community health centers to list of exclusions from the section; P.A. 05-272 designated existing language as Subsec. (a), made technical changes in Subsec. (a), added Subsec. (b) to subject practitioners who violate provisions of Subsec. (a) to disciplinary action and added Subsec. (c) to allow certain professional service corporations whose capital stock is held by or under the control of a personal representative or the estate of a deceased or incompetent dentist to operate a dental office or other location for the purpose or rendering professional dental services for a reasonable and limited period of time, effective July 13, 2005.
Where plaintiff is charged with violating section by practicing dentistry in office operating under trade name, court could not read into section anything from which violation under charge preferred could be found. 149 C. 265. Cited. 150 C. 300.
Based on the plain language of statute, language of Sec. 33-182g and the statutory scheme governing Probate Court, section cannot be interpreted to impose a reasonable time limit within which administrator of an estate must cease owning and operating a dental practice. 84 CA 639.
Cited. 21 CS 332.
| (Return to Chapter Table of Contents) |
(Return to List of Chapters) |
(Return to List of Titles) |