Connecticut General Statutes
Conn. Gen. Stat. § 45a-541a (2026)
Prudent investor rule
✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
CT-CGAcga.ct.gov (official)
JustiaTitle on Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
(a) Except as provided in subsection (b) of this section, a trustee who invests and manages trust assets owes a duty to the beneficiaries of the trust to comply with the prudent investor rule, as set forth in sections 45a-541 to 45a-541l, inclusive.
(b) The prudent investor rule is a default rule that may be expanded, restricted, eliminated or otherwise altered by provisions of the trust. A trustee is not liable to a beneficiary to the extent that the trustee acted in reasonable reliance on provisions of the trust.
(P.A. 97-140, S. 2.)
| (Return to Chapter Table of Contents) |
(Return to List of Chapters) |
(Return to List of Titles) |
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 2
cases, 2008–2019 · leading case: Knight v. Comm'r, 552 U.S. 181 (2008).
Knight v. Comm'r, 552 U.S. 181 (2008). “It argued that the Trustee’s fiduciary duty to act as a “prudent investor” *186 under the Connecticut Uniform Prudent Investor Act, Conn. Gen. Stat. §§45a-541a to 45a-541£ (2007), 2 required the Trustee to obtain investment advisory services, and therefore to pay investment…”
Tatoian v. Tyler, 194 Conn. App. 1 (Conn. App. Ct. 2019). “The applicability of the duties imposed by the Connecticut Uniform Prudent Investor Act, including the duty to diversify in § 45a-541c, is determined pursuant to Gen- eral Statutes § 45a-541a, which provides: ‘(a) Except as provided in subsection (b) of this section, a trustee…”
— Conn. Gen. Stat. § 45a-541a(a) — 1 case
Knight v. Comm'r, 552 U.S. 181 (2008). “It argued that the Trustee’s fiduciary duty to act as a “prudent investor” *186 under the Connecticut Uniform Prudent Investor Act, Conn. Gen. Stat. §§45a-541a to 45a-541£ (2007), 2 required the Trustee to obtain investment advisory services, and therefore to pay investment…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.