Conn. Gen. Stat. » Title 52 — CIVIL ACTIONS · Chapter 923a — Uniform Fraudulent Transfer Act
Connecticut General Statutes

Conn. Gen. Stat. § 52-552 (2026)

Fraudulent conveyances, judgments, contracts, when void

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section CT-CGAcga.ct.gov (official) JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
Section 52-552 is repealed.

(1949 Rev., S. 8295; P.A. 91-297, S. 13.)

(Return to Chapter
Table of Contents)		 (Return to
List of Chapters)		 (Return to
List of Titles)

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 72 cases (4 in the last 5 years), 1959–2024 · leading case: Geriatrics, Inc. v. McGee, 208 A.3d 1197 (Conn. 2019).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Geriatrics, Inc. v. McGee, 208 A.3d 1197 (Conn. 2019). · cites it 6× “General Statutes § 52-552 l . No court, however, has expressly addressed the question before us.”
Molitor v. Molitor, 440 A.2d 215 (Conn. 1981). · cites it 8× “2 Our fraudulent conveyance statute, now General Statutes § 52-552, 3 was first adopted in 1702, and has long been held substantially identical to the similar provisions of the statute of frauds, 13 Eliz.”
Gaudio v. Gaudio, 580 A.2d 1212 (Conn. App. Ct. 1990). · cites it 5× “General Statutes § 52-552, Connecticut’s fraudulent conveyance statute, provides: “All fraudulent conveyances .”
State v. Goggin, 546 A.2d 250 (Conn. 1988). · cites it 4× “10 General Statutes § 17-83Z has, as an element of the fraudulent conveyance that it sets up, not only the “less than fair market value” component but also the knowledge, actual or constructive, of the proscribed purpose of such conveyances under this statute. “ ‘The…”
Farrell v. Farrell, 650 A.2d 608 (Conn. App. Ct. 1994). · cites it 9× “He did find, however, that the properties at issue had been fraudulently conveyed; accordingly, he found that the case was controlled by General Statutes § 52-552, 8 governing fraudulent conveyances.”
Ossen v. Bernatovich (In Re Nat'l Safe Ne., Inc.), 76 B.R. 896 (Bankr. D. Conn. 1987). · cites it 14× “” The same test applies under Connecticut’s fraudulent conveyance statute, Conn.Gen.Stat. § 52-552. United States v.”
Travelers Indem. Co. v. Rubin, 551 A.2d 1220 (Conn. 1988). · cites it 6× “I The plaintiff claims that the trial court erred in holding that this action was barred by the three year statute of limitations for tort actions.”
Coan v. Andersen (In Re Andersen), 166 B.R. 516 (Bankr. D. Conn. 1994). · cites it 17× “The plaintiffs action therefore appropriately utilizes former Conn.Gen.Stat. § 52-552 (1949 Conn.Rev.S.”
Hirsch v. Marinelli (In Re Colonial Realty Co.), 168 B.R. 506 (Bankr. D. Conn. 1994). · cites it 14× “In Count I the trustee asserts the transfer, pursuant to Conn.Gen.Stat. § 52-552 (repealed 1991), 3 constituted a fraudulent conveyance as made with “actual intent to avoid any debt or duty,” without any “substantial consideration to the debtors,” and made while the debtors were…”
Kaczynski v. Kaczynski, 951 A.2d 690 (Conn. App. Ct. 2008). · cites it 10× “" [4] The plaintiff asserted, in her amended complaint, that the defendant partook in transfers of property "without substantial consideration and removed the property from the marital estate that would otherwise have been subject to the claims of equitable distribution.”
Tyler v. Schnabel, 641 A.2d 388 (Conn. App. Ct. 1994). · cites it 5× “Prior to that adoption, General Statutes § 52-552 governed fraudulent conveyances.”
Patrocinio v. Yalanis, 492 A.2d 215 (Conn. App. Ct. 1985). · cites it 8× “The plaintiffs brought suit to recover the amounts due on the promissory notes, and to set aside the transfer of the defendant’s interest in the family home as a fraudulent conveyance pursuant to General Statutes § 52-552. 2 The plaintiffs also sought an accounting of the assets…”
Show all 72 citing cases →
— Conn. Gen. Stat. § 52-552(b)(7) — 1 case
Carney v. Lopez, 933 F. Supp. 2d 365 (D. Conn. 2013).
— Conn. Gen. Stat. § 52-552(e) — 1 case
Vallejo Sanitation & Flood Control Dist. v. Fuld, 903 F. Supp. 2d 152 (S.D.N.Y. 2012).
— Conn. Gen. Stat. § 52-552(e)(2003) — 1 case
Nat'l Council on Comp. Ins. v. Caro & Graifman, P.C., 259 F. Supp. 2d 172 (D. Conn. 2003).
— Conn. Gen. Stat. § 52-552(f) — 1 case
IDS Holding Co., LLC v. Madsen (In Re IDS Holding Co., LLC), 292 B.R. 233 (Bankr. D. Conn. 2003).
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.