Conn. Gen. Stat. » Title 52 — CIVIL ACTIONS · Chapter 923a — Uniform Fraudulent Transfer Act
Connecticut General Statutes

Conn. Gen. Stat. § 52-552j (2026)

Extinguishment of cause of action

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section CT-CGAcga.ct.gov (official) JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
A cause of action with respect to a fraudulent transfer or obligation under sections 52-552a to 52-552l, inclusive, is extinguished unless action is brought: (1) Under subdivision (1) of subsection (a) of section 52-552e, within four years after the transfer was made or the obligation was incurred or, if later, within one year after the transfer or obligation was or could reasonably have been discovered by the claimant; (2) under subdivision (2) of subsection (a) of section 52-552e or subsection (a) of section 52-552f, within four years after the transfer was made or the obligation was incurred; or (3) under subsection (b) of section 52-552f, within one year after the transfer was made or the obligation was incurred.

(P.A. 91-297, S. 10.)

Cited. 46 CA 199.

(Return to Chapter
Table of Contents)		 (Return to
List of Chapters)		 (Return to
List of Titles)

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 20 cases (5 in the last 5 years), 1994–2024 · leading case: Connecticut Nat'l Bank v. D'Onofrio, 699 A.2d 237 (Conn. App. Ct. 1997).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Connecticut Nat'l Bank v. D'Onofrio, 699 A.2d 237 (Conn. App. Ct. 1997). · cites it 14× “The defendants filed an answer and a special defense that the statute of limitations had run pursuant to General Statutes § 52-552j. 3 Following a jury trial, the case was submitted to the jury with interrogatories as to Louis and Janice, and Marshall and Emma.”
Epperson v. Ent. Express, Inc., 338 F. Supp. 2d 328 (D. Conn. 2004). · cites it 7× “§ 52-552j. This statute of repose sets forth different time bars applicable to different types of claims.”
Nat'l Loan Investors, L.P. v. World Props., LLC, 830 A.2d 1178 (Conn. App. Ct. 2003). · cites it 3× ““The UFTA sets forth three limitation periods in [General Statutes] § 52-552j. The first limitation of action of four years applies to transfers made with actual intent under § 52-552e (a) (1).”
Daly v. Deptula (In Re Carrozzella & Richardson), 286 B.R. 480 (D. Conn. 2002). · cites it 2× “Undoubtedly, he chose to proceed under § 544(b), as opposed to § 548(a)(1)(B), in order to take advantage of Connecticut's four-year statute of limitations applicable to actions brought under Connecticut's Uniform Fraudulent Transfer Act, Conn. Gen.Stat. § 52-552f. See Conn. Gen.”
Montanaro v. Gorelick, 807 A.2d 1083 (Conn. App. Ct. 2002). · cites it 4× “The defendant filed an answer denying all claims of fraudulent conveyances and asserted by way of a special defense that the statute of limitations had run on each of the seven counts pursuant to General Statutes § 52-552j. 7 The plaintiff *322 then filed a reply to the special…”
Daly v. Richardson (In Re Carrozzella & Richardson), 302 B.R. 415 (Bankr. D. Conn. 2003). · cites it 2× “Yet state law presents three procedural dimensions which are at variance with those of Section 548.”
Joslin v. Grossman, 107 F. Supp. 2d 150 (D. Conn. 2000). · cites it 3× “” Id. (citations omitted). “[L]eg-islation that affects only matters of procedure is presumed to be applicable to all actions, whether pending or not, in the absence of any expressed intention to the contrary.”
Hirsch v. Marinelli (In Re Colonial Realty Co.), 168 B.R. 506 (Bankr. D. Conn. 1994). · cites it 2× “also Conn.Gen.Stat. § 52-552j (statute of limitations for UFTA claims creating an alternative one-year limitation period that begins to run only when the transfer “was or could reasonably have been discovered by the claimant”).”
Finn v. All. Bank, 838 N.W.2d 585 (Minn. Ct. App. 2013). “§ 38-8-110 (2012); Conn. Gen.Stat. § 52-552j (2012); Del.Code Ann.”
Unifoods, S.A. de C.V. v. Magallanes (Conn. App. Ct. 2024). · cites it 53× “2 General Statutes § 52-552j provides: ‘‘A cause of action with respect to a fraudulent transfer or obligation under sections 52-552a to 52-552l, inclu- sive, is extinguished unless action is brought: (1) Under subdivision (1) of subsection (a) of section 52-552e, within four…”
Daly v. Parete (In re Carrozzella & Richardson), 270 B.R. 92 (Bankr. D. Conn. 2001). · cites it 2× “See C.G.S. § 52-552j; cf. 11 U.S.C. § 108 . 2.”
United States v. Snyder, 233 F. Supp. 2d 293 (D. Conn. 2002). “§ 52-552j, the statute of limitations with respect to a fraudulent transfer extinguishes a claim unless the action is brought within four years of the transfer or, if .”
Show all 20 citing cases →
— Conn. Gen. Stat. § 52-552j(1) — 1 case
Cendant Corp. v. Shelton, 473 F. Supp. 2d 307 (D. Conn. 2007).
— Conn. Gen. Stat. § 52-552j(3) — 1 case
Epperson v. Ent. Express, Inc., 338 F. Supp. 2d 328 (D. Conn. 2004). “§ 52-552j. This statute of repose sets forth different time bars applicable to different types of claims.”
— Conn. Gen. Stat. § 52-552j(l) — 2 cases
Epperson v. Ent. Express, Inc., 338 F. Supp. 2d 328 (D. Conn. 2004). “§ 52-552j. This statute of repose sets forth different time bars applicable to different types of claims.”
The Cadle Co. v. Ogalin, 495 F. Supp. 2d 278 (D. Conn. 2007).
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.