Connecticut General Statutes

Conn. Gen. Stat. § 54-98 (2026)

Execution of mittimus for commitment to Connecticut Correctional Institution, Somers

✓ current as of May 2026

Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section CT-CGAcga.ct.gov (official) JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

The Chief Court Administrator or the administrator's designee shall execute each mittimus for the commitment of convicts to the Connecticut Correctional Institution, Somers, by delivering such convicts to the warden of said institution or such warden's agent at said institution.

(1949 Rev., S. 8814; 1959, P.A. 615, S. 11; 1969, P.A. 297; P.A. 00-99, S. 121, 154; P.A. 01-195, S. 71, 181.)

History: 1959 act substituted mittimus for warrant; 1969 act replaced “jail” with “community correctional center”; P.A. 00-99 replaced reference to sheriffs with the Chief Court Administrator or the administrator's designee and deleted provisions re fees payable to sheriffs for prisoner transportation, effective December 1, 2000; P.A. 01-195 made a technical change for the purpose of gender neutrality, effective July 11, 2001.

Cited. 185 C. 540.

Cited. 16 CS 79.

(Return to Chapter
Table of Contents)

(Return to
List of Chapters)

(Return to
List of Titles)

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 2 cases, 1964–2018 · leading case: State v. Lenihan, 200 A.2d 476 (Conn. 1964).

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

State v. Lenihan, 200 A.2d 476 (Conn. 1964). · cites it 2× “General Statutes § 54-98. It is presumed until the contrary appears that every act recited in a judicial record was properly done.”

State of Tennessee v. Jerry Reginald Burkes (Tenn. Crim. App. 2018). “1964); see Conn. Gen. Stat. Ann. § 54-98 (West). -16- As is applicable in this case, “[a] multiple offender is a defendant who has received .”

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.