Connecticut General Statutes

Conn. Gen. Stat. § 9-211 (2026)

United States senator; vacancy

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section CT-CGAcga.ct.gov (official) JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
(a) In case of a vacancy in the office of senator in Congress, the Governor, except as otherwise provided by federal or state law, shall, not more than ten days after the occurrence of such vacancy, issue writs of election directed to the town clerks or assistant town clerks ordering an election to be held on the one hundred fiftieth day after the issue of such writs on a day, other than a Saturday or Sunday, to fill such vacancy for the remaining portion of the term vacated, provided (1) except as provided in subdivisions (2) and (3) of this subsection, if such a vacancy occurs between the one hundred twenty-fifth day and the sixty-third day before the day of a regular state or municipal election in November of any year, the Governor shall so issue such writs that order an election to be held on the day of such regular election, (2) except as provided in subdivision (3) of this subsection, if such vacancy occurs after the municipal election in the year preceding the last year of the term of a senator or in the last year of the term of a senator, the Governor shall nominate a person to fill such vacancy and such nomination shall be filed with both the clerk of the Senate and the clerk of the House of Representatives. Approval of such nomination shall require an affirmative vote of two-thirds of the membership of each chamber of the General Assembly, or (3) if such a vacancy occurs in the year of a state election and not more than sixty-two days prior to such election, and the office of senator in Congress for which the vacancy exists will be on the ballot during such election, the Governor shall not issue such writs and no election shall be held under this section. If the position vacated is that of member-elect, the Governor shall so issue writs and an election shall be held as provided in this section.

(b) The Governor shall cause writs of election issued pursuant to subsection (a) of this section to be conveyed to a state marshal, who shall forthwith transmit an attested copy thereof to such clerks or assistant clerks. Such clerks or assistant clerks, on receiving such writs, shall warn elections to be held on the day appointed therein in the same manner as state elections are warned, which elections shall be organized and conducted as are state elections, and the vote shall be declared, certified, directed, deposited, returned and transmitted in the same manner as at a state election.

(1949 Rev., S. 1109; 1953, S. 692d; November, 1955, S. N112; P.A. 06-137, S. 9; P.A. 09-170, S. 1.)

History: P.A. 06-137 changed each reference re time period within a state election from 60 days to 150 days, effective June 6, 2006; P.A. 09-170 replaced former provisions re authority of Governor to fill vacancy by appointment with Subsec. (a) re the ordering of an election to fill vacancy and exceptions, and Subsec. (b) re issuance of writs of election, effective June 25, 2009.

Cited. 41 CS 267.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 2 cases, 1988–2010 · leading case: Judge v. Quinn, 612 F.3d 537 (7th Cir. 2010).
Judge v. Quinn, 612 F.3d 537 (7th Cir. 2010). “, Conn. Gen.Stat. Ann. § 9-211(a)(3) (West 2009) (if the vacancy occurs within 62 days of a scheduled election, “the Governor shall not issue such writs and no election shall be held”), but the Illinois statute contains nothing close to the prohibitory language used by these…”
Bd. of Educ. v. Freedom of Info. Comm'n, 566 A.2d 1380 (Conn. Super. Ct. 1988). · cites it 2× “See General Statutes §§ 9-211, 9-213, 9-221 (a), 9-222, 7-107, 7-343, 7-20 and 12-137.”
— Conn. Gen. Stat. § 9-211(a)(3) — 1 case
Judge v. Quinn, 612 F.3d 537 (7th Cir. 2010). “, Conn. Gen.Stat. Ann. § 9-211(a)(3) (West 2009) (if the vacancy occurs within 62 days of a scheduled election, “the Governor shall not issue such writs and no election shall be held”), but the Illinois statute contains nothing close to the prohibitory language used by these…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.