Del. C. » Title 10 — Organization, Powers, Jurisdiction and Operation of Courts · CHAPTER 19. General Provisions Applicable to Courts and Judges · Courts and Judicial Procedure
Delaware Code

10 Del. C. § 1901 (2026)

State of the judiciary message

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section DE-DELCdelcode.delaware.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

The Chief Justice of the Supreme Court shall, from time to time, give to the General Assembly information of affairs concerning the state of the judiciary, and recommend to its consideration such measures as the Chief Justice shall deem expedient.

60 Del. Laws, c. 182, §  2;  70 Del. Laws, c. 186, §  1; 
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 24 cases, 1968–1976 · leading case: Diebold Comput. Leasing, Inc. v. Com. Credit Corp., 267 A.2d 586 (Del. 1970).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Diebold Comput. Leasing, Inc. v. Com. Credit Corp., 267 A.2d 586 (Del. 1970). · cites it 2× “Thereupon, the Chancery Court ordered that the action be dismissed if Diebold did not elect, within 60 days, to transfer the cause to the Superior Court under 10 Del.C. § 1901. 1 Diebold appeals. II. The subject-matter jurisdiction of the Chancery Court depends solely, at this…”
Donovan v. Delaware Water & Air Resources Comm'n, 358 A.2d 717 (Del. 1976). “The suit was filed in the Court of Chancery but was dismissed on jurisdictional grounds and transferred to the Superior Court, 10 Del.C. § 1901, where it was consolidated with the appeal from the WARC decision.”
In Re Markel, 254 A.2d 236 (Del. 1969). · cites it 2× “This is so because there is a complete and adequate remedy at law to determine the right to possession of these chattels. There is no allegation or proof *240 in this record that these particular chattels had a unique or special value, or that there was pretium affectionis.”
Sonne v. Sacks, 314 A.2d 194 (Del. 1973). “Pharmacy, the judgment below must be set aside, with permission to the appellant to request a transfer of the case against them to the Court of Chancery under 10 Del.C. § 1901. As to P. G. Pharmacy, the judgment must be reversed with instructions to enter judgment in appellant’s…”
Chavin v. H. H. Rosin & Co., 246 A.2d 921 (Del. 1968). “However, because of the already too long delay in the ending of this controversy, we will remand the cause with instructions to dismiss for lack of jurisdiction, but with leave to the plaintiff to apply under 10 Del.C. § 1901 for trans-ferral to the Superior Court.”
Wife, P. v. Husband, P., 287 A.2d 409 (Del. Ch. 1972). “114, 116 creates in the Family Court an adequate remedy at law sufficient to divest the Court of Chancery of jurisdiction in child support cases. ****** Defendant’s motion to dismiss is granted, subject to plaintiff’s right to transfer the claim for child support to the Family…”
Fam. Court of the State of Delaware v. Dep't of Labor & Indus. Relations, 320 A.2d 777 (Del. Ch. 1974). “The case is therefore dismissed subject to plaintiff’s right to transfer the case to the Superior Court under 10 Del.C. § 1901. The status quo shall be maintained until the matter is presented to the Superior Court or 5:00 P.”
Wilderman v. Wilderman, 315 A.2d 610 (Del. Ch. 1974). “Accordingly, such counterclaims will either be dismissed or transferred to a court of appropriate jurisdiction as provided for under the provisions of 10 Del.C. § 1901. An appropriate order may be submitted on notice.”
E. Shore Nat. Gas Co. v. Stauffer Chem. Co., 298 A.2d 322 (Del. 1972). “The order to be entered, however, shall recognize plaintiff’s right to transfer this case to a court of competent jurisdiction under the provisions of 10 Del.C. § 1901.” (285 A.2d at 829) The opinion below does not state specifically the basis for the Court’s ruling of lack of…”
John Julian Constr. Co. v. Monarch Builders, Inc., 324 A.2d 208 (Del. 1974). “The provisions of 10 Del.C. § 1901 are available to Julian for the transfer of its claims to the Court of Chancery for possible consolidation with the companion cases there pending, For the foregoing reasons, the judgments below are affirmed, 1 .”
Wife, S. v. Husband, S., 295 A.2d 768 (Del. Ch. 1972). “The complaint will therefore be dismissed, subject to plaintiff’s right to transfer it to the Family Court under 10 Del.C. § 1901.”
Capital Educators Ass'n v. Camper, 320 A.2d 782 (Del. Ch. 1974). “Accordingly, the preliminary injunction is denied and the complaint in this Court will be dismissed, subject to the right of CEA, if it feels that it is appropriate and expeditious to do so, to transfer this action to the Superior Court pursuant to 10 Del.C. § 1901. Counsel are…”
Show all 24 citing cases →
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.