Delaware Code

12 Del. C. § 3303 (2026)

Effect of provisions of instrument [For application of this section, see 79 Del. Laws, c. 172, § 6]

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section DE-DELCdelcode.delaware.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

(a) Notwithstanding any other provision of this Code or other law, the terms of a governing instrument may expand, restrict, eliminate, or otherwise vary any laws of general application to fiduciaries, trusts, and trust administration, including, but not limited to, any such laws pertaining to:

(1) The rights and interests of beneficiaries, including, but not limited to, the right to be informed of the beneficiary’s interest for a period of time, as set forth in subsection (c) of this section;

(2) The grounds for removal of a fiduciary;

(3) The circumstances, if any, in which the fiduciary must diversify investments;

(4) The manner in which a fiduciary should invest assets, including whether to engage in 1 or more sustainable or socially responsible investment strategies, in addition to, or in place of, other investment strategies, with or without regard to investment performance;

(5) A fiduciary’s powers, duties, standard of care, rights of indemnification and liability to persons whose interests arise from that instrument; and

(6) The terms of a power of appointment over trust property;

provided, however, that nothing contained in this section shall be construed to permit the exculpation or indemnification of a fiduciary for the fiduciary’s own wilful misconduct or preclude a court of competent jurisdiction from removing a fiduciary on account of the fiduciary’s wilful misconduct. The rule that statutes in derogation of the common law are to be strictly construed shall have no application to this section. It is the policy of this section to give maximum effect to the principle of freedom of disposition and to the enforceability of governing instruments.

(b) In furtherance of and not in limitation of the provisions of subsection (a) of this section, the terms of a governing instrument of a trust established and existing for religious, charitable, scientific, literary, or educational purposes or for noncharitable purposes shall not be modified by the court to change the trust’s purposes unless the purposes of the trust have become unlawful under the Constitution of this State or the United States or the trust would otherwise no longer serve any religious, charitable, scientific, literary, educational, or noncharitable purpose, in which case the court shall proceed in the manner directed by § 3541 of this title. A settlor may maintain an action to enforce a charitable or noncharitable trust under this section and may designate a person or persons, whether or not born at the time of such designation, to enforce a charitable or noncharitable trust under this section. For purposes of this subsection, a “noncharitable purpose” is a purpose within the meaning of § 3555 or § 3556 of this title.

(c) The terms of a governing instrument may expand, restrict, eliminate, or otherwise vary the right of a beneficiary to be informed of the beneficiary’s interest in a trust for a period of time, including but not limited to:

(1) A period of time related to the age of a beneficiary;

(2) A period of time related to the lifetime of each trustor and/or spouse of a trustor;

(3) A period of time related to a term of years or specific date; and/or

(4) A period of time related to a specific event that is certain to occur.

(d) During any period of time that a governing instrument restricts or eliminates the right of a beneficiary to be informed of the beneficiary’s interest in a trust, unless otherwise provided in the governing instrument, any designated representative (as defined in § 3339 of this title) then serving shall represent and bind such beneficiary for purposes of any judicial proceeding and for purposes of any nonjudicial matter, and shall have the authority to, and is a proper party to, initiate a proceeding relating to the trust before a court or administrative tribunal on behalf of any such beneficiary.

(e) For purposes of this section, “judicial proceeding” means any proceeding before a court or administrative tribunal, including but not limited to, a proceeding that involves a trust whether or not the administration of the trust is governed by the laws of this State, and “nonjudicial matter” includes, but is not limited to, the grant of consents, releases or ratifications pursuant to § 3588 of this title and the receipt of a report for purposes of measuring the limitation period described in § 3585 of this title.

25 Del. Laws, c. 226, §  3;  Code 1915, §  3875;  37 Del. Laws, c. 259, §  140 Del. Laws, c. 230, §  1;  Code 1935, §  4401;  44 Del. Laws, c. 171, §  147 Del. Laws, c. 19, §  148 Del. Laws, c. 41, §  112 Del. C. 1953, §  3303;  59 Del. Laws, c. 271, §  372 Del. Laws, c. 388, §  974 Del. Laws, c. 82, §  175 Del. Laws, c. 97, §  376 Del. Laws, c. 90, §  176 Del. Laws, c. 254, §  379 Del. Laws, c. 172, §  279 Del. Laws, c. 352, §  280 Del. Laws, c. 89, §  181 Del. Laws, c. 320, § 482 Del. Laws, c. 52, § 1
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 12 cases (7 in the last 5 years), 2015–2024 · leading case: In the Matter of the Jeremy Paradise Dynasty Trust & The Andrew Paradise Dynasty Trust (Del. Ch. 2021).
In the Matter of the Jeremy Paradise Dynasty Trust & The Andrew Paradise Dynasty Trust (Del. Ch. 2021). · cites it 3× “”52 50 12 Del. C. § 3303. 51 12 Del. C. § 3522(2).”
In re Trust Under Will of Wallace B. Flint for the Benefit of Katherine F. Shadek (Del. Ch. 2015). · cites it 2× “‖ 12 Del. C. § 3303(a). It would undercut this policy, and might well be described as duplicitous, for our State to represent to a settlor that our law will respect his dispositions and enforce his governing instrument, only to enable his beneficiaries to rewrite that instrument…”
In re Trust Under Will of Wallace B. Flint for the Benefit of Katherine F. Shadek (Del. Ch. 2015). · cites it 2× “‖ 12 Del. C. § 3303(a). It would undercut this policy, and might well be described as duplicitous, for our State to represent to a settlor that our law will respect his dispositions and enforce his governing instrument, only to enable his beneficiaries to rewrite that instrument…”
IMO Theodore Brans (Del. Ch. 2018). “’ 12 Del. C. § 3303(a). It would undercut this policy, and might well be described as duplicitous, for our State to represent to a settlor that our law will respect his dispositions and enforce his governing instrument, only to enable his beneficiaries to rewrite that instrument…”
Ray Wayne Lynch v. Frank Barba (Del. Ch. 2018). “58 Similarly, 12 Del. C. § 3303(a) states that a trust can expand, restrict, or limit various rights and duties, but “nothing in this section shall be construed .”
Marie Ann Hurd v. Leonard Hurd, Jr. (Del. Ch. 2020). “57 12 Del. C. § 3303(a). 58 Chavin v. PNC Bank, 816 A.”
J.P. Morgan Trust Co. of Delaware, Tr. of the Fisher 2006 Trust F/B/O Hadley Fisher U/A Dated 2/16/2006 v. Fisher (Del. Ch. 2021). “12 Del. C. § 3303(a). The statute further provides that “[t]he rule that statutes in derogation of the common law are to be strictly construed shall have no application to this section.”
Deann M. Totta v. CCSB Fin. Corp. (Del. Ch. 2022). “”); see also 12 Del. C. § 3303(a) (“Notwithstanding any other provision of this Code or other law, the terms of a governing instrument may expand, restrict, eliminate, or otherwise vary any laws of general application to fiduciaries, trusts, and trust administration, including,…”
Wells Lory Hillblom v. Wilmington Trust Co. (Del. Ch. 2022). “68 12 Del. C. § 3303(a). 69 Trust Agr. § B, art.”
Debra Rende & Paula Lombard v. Frank Rende (Del. Ch. 2023). “148 12 Del. C. § 3303. 149 Ross v. Freeman, 180 A.”
New Enter. Assocs. 14, L.P. v. Rich (Del. Ch. 2023). “, 12 Del. C. § 3303(a) (“The rule that statutes in derogation of the common law are to be strictly construed shall have no application to this section.”
Lisa M. Sweeney v. Mark Sweeney (Del. Ch. 2024). “118 12 Del. C. § 3303. 119 Trust Agreement § 12.”
— 12 Del. C. § 3303(a) — 10 cases
In the Matter of the Jeremy Paradise Dynasty Trust & The Andrew Paradise Dynasty Trust (Del. Ch. 2021). “”52 50 12 Del. C. § 3303. 51 12 Del. C. § 3522(2).”
In re Trust Under Will of Wallace B. Flint for the Benefit of Katherine F. Shadek (Del. Ch. 2015). “‖ 12 Del. C. § 3303(a). It would undercut this policy, and might well be described as duplicitous, for our State to represent to a settlor that our law will respect his dispositions and enforce his governing instrument, only to enable his beneficiaries to rewrite that instrument…”
In re Trust Under Will of Wallace B. Flint for the Benefit of Katherine F. Shadek (Del. Ch. 2015). “‖ 12 Del. C. § 3303(a). It would undercut this policy, and might well be described as duplicitous, for our State to represent to a settlor that our law will respect his dispositions and enforce his governing instrument, only to enable his beneficiaries to rewrite that instrument…”
IMO Theodore Brans (Del. Ch. 2018). “’ 12 Del. C. § 3303(a). It would undercut this policy, and might well be described as duplicitous, for our State to represent to a settlor that our law will respect his dispositions and enforce his governing instrument, only to enable his beneficiaries to rewrite that instrument…”
Ray Wayne Lynch v. Frank Barba (Del. Ch. 2018). “58 Similarly, 12 Del. C. § 3303(a) states that a trust can expand, restrict, or limit various rights and duties, but “nothing in this section shall be construed .”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.