Delaware Code

16 Del. C. § 4784 (2026)

Forfeitures

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section DE-DELCdelcode.delaware.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

(a) The following are subject to forfeiture to the State pursuant to the procedure and limitations set forth in this section:

(1) All controlled substances which have been manufactured, distributed, possessed, dispensed or acquired in violation of this chapter;

(2) All raw materials, products and equipment of any kind which are used, or intended for use, in manufacturing, compounding, processing, delivering, importing or exporting any controlled substance in violation of this chapter;

(3) Any property which is used, or intended for use, as a container for property described in paragraph (a)(1), (2) or (6) of this section;

(4) Except as provided by paragraphs (a)(4)a. through (a)(4)d. of this section, any conveyances, including aircraft, vehicles, or vessels, which are used, or are intended for use, to transport, or in any manner to facilitate the transportation, sale, or possession with intent to deliver property described in paragraph (a)(1) or (2) of this section.

a. A vehicle used by any person as a common carrier in the transaction of business as a common carrier is subject to forfeiture under this section only if the State proves by a preponderance of the evidence the owner or other person in charge of the vehicle is a consenting party or privy to a violation of this chapter.

b. A vehicle is subject to forfeiture under this section only if the State establishes by a preponderance of the evidence that a violation of this chapter occurred with the owner’s knowledge or consent.

c. A vehicle is not subject to forfeiture for a violation of § 4761, § 4763 or § 4764 of this title.

d. A forfeiture of a vehicle encumbered by a bona fide security interest is subject to the interest of the secured party if the secured party neither had knowledge of nor consented to the unlawful act or omission. The burden is on the State to prove the secured party’s knowledge of or consent to the unlawful act or omission;

(5) All books, records, and research products and materials including formulas, microfilm, tapes and data which are used or intended for use in violation of this chapter;

(6) All drug paraphernalia as defined in § 4701(18) of this title;

(7) Moneys, negotiable instruments, securities or any other thing of value furnished, or intended to be furnished, in exchange for a controlled substance or drug paraphernalia in violation of this chapter; all profits or proceeds traceable to securities, assets or interest used, or intended to be used, to facilitate any violation of this chapter. However, a property interest of an owner in items listed in this paragraph is not subject to forfeiture by reason of any unlawful act or omission unless the State establishes by a preponderance of the evidence that the act or omission occurred with the owner’s knowledge or consent. Currency in an amount less than $500 may not be forfeited under this section.

a., b. [Repealed.]

c. To the extent that assets, interests, profits and proceeds forfeitable under this paragraph (i) cannot be located, (ii) have been transferred, sold to or deposited with third parties, or (iii) have been placed beyond the jurisdiction of the State, the court, following conviction of the individual charged, may direct forfeiture of such other assets of the defendant as may be available, limited in value to those assets that would otherwise be forfeited under this paragraph. Upon petition of the defendant, the court may authorize redemption of assets forfeited under this paragraph, provided the assets described in this paragraph are surrendered or otherwise remitted by such defendant to the jurisdiction of the court; and

(8) Except as provided by paragraphs (a)(8)a. through (a)(8)d. of this section, any real property which is used, or is intended for use, to store, grow, manufacture, compound, process, deliver, import, or export any controlled substance in violation of this chapter.

a. Real property is subject to forfeiture under this section only if the State proves by a preponderance of the evidence that the unlawful act or omission was committed or omitted with the owner’s knowledge or consent.

b. Real property being leased out by its owner shall be subject to forfeiture under this section only if the State proves by a preponderance of the evidence that the owner of the real property is a consenting party or privy to the violation of this chapter.

c. No real property shall be subject to forfeiture for a violation of § 4759, § 4761, § 4763, or § 4764 of this title.

d. A forfeiture of real property encumbered by a bona fide security interest is subject to the interest of the secured party if the secured party neither had knowledge of nor consented to the unlawful act or omission.

(b) Notwithstanding any other provisions of the laws of this State or rules of court, the procedures listed in subsections (c) through (l) of this section are applicable to the administrative forfeiture of property subject to forfeiture under this section.

(c) Property subject to forfeiture under this chapter may be seized by the Secretary upon process issued by any Superior Court having jurisdiction over the property. Seizure without process may be made if:

(1) The seizure made is pursuant to subchapter I of Chapter 23 of Title 11 or an inspection under an administrative inspection warrant;

(2) The property subject to seizure has been the subject of a prior judgment in favor of the State in a criminal, injunction or forfeiture proceeding based upon this chapter;

(3) The Secretary has probable cause to believe that the property is directly or indirectly dangerous to health or safety; or

(4) The Secretary has probable cause to believe that the property was used or intended to be used in violation of this chapter.

(d) In the event of seizure pursuant to subsection (c) of this section, proceedings under subsections (e) and (j) of this section shall be instituted promptly.

(e) Property taken or detained under this section shall not be subject to replevin, but is deemed to be in the custody of the Secretary subject only to the orders and decrees of the Superior Court. When property is seized under this chapter, the Secretary may:

(1) Place the property under seal;

(2) Remove the property to a place designated by the Secretary; or

(3) Require the Department of Safety and Homeland Security to take custody of the property and remove it to an appropriate location for disposition in accordance with law.

(f) When property is forfeited under this chapter, the Secretary may do any of the following:

(1) Retain it for official use.

(2) Sell that which is not required to be destroyed by law and which is not harmful to the public. The proceeds may be used for payment of all proper expenses of the proceedings for forfeiture and sale, including expenses of seizure, maintenance of custody, advertising, and court costs.

(3) Allow the arresting agency or any other law-enforcement division to use the property for the purpose of law enforcement provided that any proceeds remaining after the payment of expenses and any money forfeited or realized from forfeited property must be deposited to the Special Law Enforcement Assistance Fund for the use of the State for the purposes as established by the Attorney General with the concurrence of the Director of the Office of Management and Budget and the Controller General.

(4) Require the Department of Safety and Homeland Security to take custody of the property and remove it for disposition in accordance with law.

(5) Forward it to the Administration for disposition.

(g) Controlled substances listed in Schedule I that are possessed, transferred, sold or offered for sale in violation of this chapter are contraband and shall be seized and summarily forfeited to the State. Controlled substances listed in Schedule I, the owners of which are unknown, which are seized or come into the possession of the State are contraband and shall be summarily forfeited to the State.

(h) Species of plants from which controlled substances in Schedules I and II may be derived which have been planted or cultivated in violation of this chapter or of which the owners or cultivators are unknown or which are wild growths may be seized and summarily forfeited to the State.

(i) The failure, upon demand by the Secretary or the Secretary’s authorized agent, of the person in occupancy or in control of land or premises upon which the species of plants are growing or being stored to produce an appropriate registration or proof that the person is the holder thereof constitutes authority for the seizure and forfeiture of the plants.

(j) Property seized pursuant to this section that is not summarily forfeited pursuant to subsection (g) or (h) of this section shall be forfeited to the State upon application to the Superior Court. The application must include, for each item requested to be forfeited, a statement of the unlawful act or omission to which it is alleged to be connected and, if the item is not currency, the approximate value of the item. If, within 45 days of notification of seizure to all known parties having possessory interest in the seized property by registered or certified mail to the last known post-office address of the parties in interest and by publication in a newspaper of general circulation in this State, no person has instituted proceedings in the Superior Court for return of property, the Court may order the property automatically forfeited if the application is facially sufficient.

(1), (2) [Repealed.]

(k) Other than property subject to summary forfeiture under subsection (g) or (h) of this section, property may not be seized or forfeited pursuant to this chapter unless a criminal offense is charged.

(l) Property ordered by the Court to be returned to its owner must be returned forthwith and the party in possession of the property pending the determination is responsible and personally liable for the property from the time of seizure to the time of return, including any fees associated with towing, storage, or maintenance of the property.

16 Del. C. 1953, §  4769;  58 Del. Laws, c. 424, §  162 Del. Laws, c. 250, §§  2, 464 Del. Laws, c. 246, §§  2, 367 Del. Laws, c. 260, §  167 Del. Laws, c. 450, §  170 Del. Laws, c. 186, §  171 Del. Laws, c. 288, §  1173 Del. Laws, c. 349, §  2075 Del. Laws, c. 88, §  21(8)75 Del. Laws, c. 350, §  193(c)78 Del. Laws, c. 13, §  6581 Del. Laws, c. 410, § 182 Del. Laws, c. 217, § 1283 Del. Laws, c. 37, § 2184 Del. Laws, c. 375, § 1
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 12 cases (3 in the last 5 years), 1994–2024 · leading case: Hall v. State, 655 A.2d 827 (Del. Super. Ct. 1994).
Hall v. State, 655 A.2d 827 (Del. Super. Ct. 1994). “In support of its position, the State cites 16 Del.C. § 4784(a) (“no property right shall exist .”
Nasir v. State of Delaware (Del. Super. Ct. 2024). · cites it 15× “She later issued an order pursuant to Superior Court Civil Rule 132(a)(4) (the “Order,” attached as Exhibit A) that contained her proposed findings of fact and recommendations.”
Thomas v. State (Del. Super. Ct. 2024). · cites it 11× “STANDARD OF REVIEW Civil forfeitures are governed by provisions of 16 Del. C. § 4784, a statute intended by Delaware’s Legislature to “cripple the trafficking and sale of illegal drugs.”
Holloman v. State (Del. Super. Ct. 2017). · cites it 5× “An ion scan of the money revealed cocaine residue, thus engendering this forfeiture action pursuant to 16 Del. C. § 4784. The primary dispute at trial was whether the allegedly prolonged detention at the scene constituted a separate seizure apart from the initial stop for the…”
Mustafa v. State (Del. Super. Ct. 2018). · cites it 5× “Mustafa ("Petitioner") has filed a Petition for Return of Property pursuant to 16 Del. C. § 4784 and Superior Court Civil Rule 71.”
In the Matter of $13,584.00 in U.S.C. - Jeffrey Crippen (Del. Super. Ct. 2018). · cites it 5× “Kl7M-08-008 WLW December 28, 2018 INTRODUCTION Petitioner Jeffrey Crippen ("Petitioner") has filed an application for Retum of Property pursuant to 16 Del. C. § 4784 and Superior Court Civil Rule 71.”
Brown v. State (Del. 2019). · cites it 5× “8 16 Del. C. § 4784(a)(4). 6 Del. C. § 4784(a)(7).”
Winchester v. State (Del. Super. Ct. 2016). · cites it 3× “§ 4784(a)(4)(b); (4) she had a lawfully possessory interest in the vehicle as she paid for same with proceeds from her social security income payments 16 Del C. § 4784@)(1); and (5) Delco Credit Union is a current lien holder with a security interest in the 2006 Dodge Ram.”
Maldonado v. State (Del. 2016). · cites it 2× “First, he contends that the State should be collaterally estopped from seeking 1 See 16 Del. C. § 4784(a)(7) (Supp. 2014) (providing, among other things, that profits from drug sales are subject to forfeiture).”
Crippen v. State (Del. 2019). “(2) A notice of appeal must be timely filed to invoke the Court’s appellate jurisdiction.”
Mumford v. State (Del. 2023). “7, 2023), and has affirmed in part and reversed in part the Superior Court’s ruling on Mumford’s petitions for return of property that the State argued was subject to forfeiture under 16 Del. C. § 4784, Brown v. State, 214 A.”
Lawson v. State of Delaware. (Del. Super. Ct. 2015). “1 Pursuant to 16 Del. C. § 4784(a)(4), the State of Delaware seized the 2000 Ford focus and initiated forfeiture proceedings.”
— 16 Del. C. § 4784(a) — 2 cases
Hall v. State, 655 A.2d 827 (Del. Super. Ct. 1994). “In support of its position, the State cites 16 Del.C. § 4784(a) (“no property right shall exist .”
Nasir v. State of Delaware (Del. Super. Ct. 2024). “She later issued an order pursuant to Superior Court Civil Rule 132(a)(4) (the “Order,” attached as Exhibit A) that contained her proposed findings of fact and recommendations.”
— 16 Del. C. § 4784(a)(4) — 2 cases
Brown v. State (Del. 2019). “8 16 Del. C. § 4784(a)(4). 6 Del. C. § 4784(a)(7).”
Lawson v. State of Delaware. (Del. Super. Ct. 2015). “1 Pursuant to 16 Del. C. § 4784(a)(4), the State of Delaware seized the 2000 Ford focus and initiated forfeiture proceedings.”
— 16 Del. C. § 4784(a)(4)(b) — 1 case
Winchester v. State (Del. Super. Ct. 2016). “§ 4784(a)(4)(b); (4) she had a lawfully possessory interest in the vehicle as she paid for same with proceeds from her social security income payments 16 Del C. § 4784@)(1); and (5) Delco Credit Union is a current lien holder with a security interest in the 2006 Dodge Ram.”
— 16 Del. C. § 4784(a)(7) — 5 cases
Maldonado v. State (Del. 2016). “First, he contends that the State should be collaterally estopped from seeking 1 See 16 Del. C. § 4784(a)(7) (Supp. 2014) (providing, among other things, that profits from drug sales are subject to forfeiture).”
Mustafa v. State (Del. Super. Ct. 2018). “Mustafa ("Petitioner") has filed a Petition for Return of Property pursuant to 16 Del. C. § 4784 and Superior Court Civil Rule 71.”
Thomas v. State (Del. Super. Ct. 2024). “STANDARD OF REVIEW Civil forfeitures are governed by provisions of 16 Del. C. § 4784, a statute intended by Delaware’s Legislature to “cripple the trafficking and sale of illegal drugs.”
Holloman v. State (Del. Super. Ct. 2017). “An ion scan of the money revealed cocaine residue, thus engendering this forfeiture action pursuant to 16 Del. C. § 4784. The primary dispute at trial was whether the allegedly prolonged detention at the scene constituted a separate seizure apart from the initial stop for the…”
Brown v. State (Del. 2019). “8 16 Del. C. § 4784(a)(4). 6 Del. C. § 4784(a)(7).”
— 16 Del. C. § 4784(a)(7)(a) — 1 case
Thomas v. State (Del. Super. Ct. 2024). “STANDARD OF REVIEW Civil forfeitures are governed by provisions of 16 Del. C. § 4784, a statute intended by Delaware’s Legislature to “cripple the trafficking and sale of illegal drugs.”
— 16 Del. C. § 4784(a)(7)(b) — 2 cases
Thomas v. State (Del. Super. Ct. 2024). “STANDARD OF REVIEW Civil forfeitures are governed by provisions of 16 Del. C. § 4784, a statute intended by Delaware’s Legislature to “cripple the trafficking and sale of illegal drugs.”
Brown v. State (Del. 2019). “8 16 Del. C. § 4784(a)(4). 6 Del. C. § 4784(a)(7).”
— 16 Del. C. § 4784(j) — 3 cases
Holloman v. State (Del. Super. Ct. 2017). “An ion scan of the money revealed cocaine residue, thus engendering this forfeiture action pursuant to 16 Del. C. § 4784. The primary dispute at trial was whether the allegedly prolonged detention at the scene constituted a separate seizure apart from the initial stop for the…”
Thomas v. State (Del. Super. Ct. 2024). “STANDARD OF REVIEW Civil forfeitures are governed by provisions of 16 Del. C. § 4784, a statute intended by Delaware’s Legislature to “cripple the trafficking and sale of illegal drugs.”
Brown v. State (Del. 2019). “8 16 Del. C. § 4784(a)(4). 6 Del. C. § 4784(a)(7).”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.