United States v. Ignasio Maldenaldo Sanchez, 242 F.3d 1294 (11th Cir. 2001). · Go Syfert
Search
United States v. Ignasio Maldenaldo Sanchez, 242 F.3d 1294 (11th Cir. 2001). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
16 citation events (16 in the last 25 years) across 2 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: United States v. Ignasio Maldenaldo Sanchez, United States of America v. Santiago Gilberto Sanchez (ca11, 2001-10-17)
Top citers, strongest first. 3 distinct citers.
discussed Cited "see" United States v. Ignasio Maldenaldo Sanchez, United States of America v. Santiago Gilberto Sanchez (2×)
11th Cir. · 2001 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Sanchez, 242 F.3d 1294 (11th Cir.2001).
cited Cited "see" United States v. Santiago Gilberto Sanchez
11th Cir. · 2001 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Sanchez, 242 F.3d 1294 (11th Cir. 2001).
cited Cited "see" United States v. Ignasio Maldenaldo Sanchez
11th Cir. · 2001 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Sanchez, 242 F.3d 1294 (11th Cir. 2001).
United States
v.
Ignasio Maldenaldo Sanchez
00-13347.
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit.
Feb 26, 2001.
242 F.3d 1294
Cited by 1 opinion  |  Published

PUBLISH IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT ________________________________

No. 00-13347 ________________________________

D.C. Docket No. 98-00049-CR

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus

IGNASIO MALDENALDO SANCHEZ, Defendant-Appellant.

_________________________________

No. 00-13447 _________________________________

D.C. Docket No. 98-00049-CR

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus

SANTIAGO GILBERTO SANCHEZ, Defendant-Appellant.

_________________________________________________________________

Appeals from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Georgia _________________________________________________________________

(Opinion February 26, 2001, 242 F.3d . 1294, 11th Cir., 2001)

(April 19, 2001)

Before ANDERSON, Chief Judge, TJOFLAT, EDMONDSON, BIRCH, DUBINA, BLACK, CARNES, BARKETT, HULL, MARCUS and WILSON, Circuit Judges.

BY THE COURT:

A member of this court in active service having requested a poll on the suggestion

of rehearing en banc and a majority of the judges in this court in active service having voted in favor of granting a rehearing en banc, IT IS ORDERED that the above causes shall be reheard by this court en banc. The previous panel's opinion is hereby VACATED.

[*2]